I think we've strayed from the initial subject. I've got no objection
to Mozilla using Type 42 CIDFonts, Type 100 halftones, Type 4 images
and an embedded APL interpreter. Whatever.
As long as they don't use Xprint.
JC their choice to use Type 42 CIDFonts
JS Given that truetype fonts are much
JS Even with this weakness, Xprint is by far the best printing
JS solution available at the moment for Mozilla under Unix/X11
JS because postscript printing module of Mozilla does not work very
JS well yet
Xprint might work for CJK fonts, although I'm a little bit suprised at
your enthusiasm
On 10 Dec 2002, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
JS Even with this weakness, Xprint is by far the best printing
JS solution available at the moment for Mozilla under Unix/X11
JS because postscript printing module of Mozilla does not work very
JS well yet
JC Xprint might work for CJK fonts,
It
