At 04:32 PM 9/12/01 +1000, Peter West wrote:
I concur with much of what you have said here, and I am much more
comfortable in C than in Java. C++ I have always avoided. That said, I
would personally prefer to pursue the Java development for career
reasons - I have much more chance of getting
Dear Arved others,
I'm willing to volunteer to help with the C implementation.
I would also like to see a data structures + algorithms
approach to the project. At least it will provide some
interesting comparisons!
Regards,
Mick /\
\ /
: Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:49 AM
Subject: A C XSL-FO processor
Hi, all
I finally buckled, and initiated a SourceForge project to develop a
C-language XSL-FO formatter. The link is
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xslfo-proc
Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:49 AM
Subject: A C XSL-FO processor
Hi, all
I finally buckled, and initiated a SourceForge project to develop a
C-language XSL-FO formatter. The link is
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xslfo-proc/. Right now
I'm very interested but I haven't done alot of C programming so I may not be of
much help in the beginning. I'd especially be interested in Perl bindings for
such a project and could definitely help out in that area as I've done some XS
stuff in the past.
On 10-Sep-2001 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
This is for all those developers out there that like the technology (XSL)
but aren't turning cartwheels over Java. That includes me.
And me.
Now you're speaking my language.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
