Joe DeVivo wrote:
> I just stumbled on to Fop earlier this week and it looks like something
> I can really get into working on. I've been looking at the source and
Good choice. I think FOP is one of the coolest projects imaginable.
> getting my feet wet, like with the patch I just submitted for
27;
Subject: RE: Getting started FOP question
Would you recommend using XSLTransform to do this?
Oh, and thanks for the advice I am going to do as you suggest.
Erich
-Original Message-
From: COFFMAN Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:40 AM
To: '[EMAIL PRO
Would you recommend using XSLTransform to do this?
Oh, and thanks for the advice I am going to do as you suggest.
Erich
-Original Message-
From: COFFMAN Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:40 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Getting s
When debugging, it's a good idea to run any XSL:T seperate from processing
the result XSL:FO so you can figure out which part is messing up if there
are problems. If you see tags in in your FO, you've got a problem in
your XSL:T. While FOP can be asked to convert XSL:T to XSL:FO and then
process
