Re: TXTRenderer

2001-10-12 Thread Brian T. Wolf
t one xsl so the different incarnations appear somewhat similar.   - Original Message - From: Matthew L. Avizinis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: RE: TXTRenderer What I meant was have you tried the following in place of

RE: TXTRenderer

2001-10-12 Thread Matthew L. Avizinis
What I meant was have you tried the following in place of using the fop text renderer option.  If text output is what you want, then you really wouldn't need fop at all; your XSLT engine would produce the output you want.   You didn't provide many other details,  so if assuming your using a

RE: TXTRenderer

2001-10-12 Thread Matthew L. Avizinis
You didn't provide many other details,  so if assuming your using a stylesheet of some kind,   have you tried ...the rest of the stylsheet... ?   You'd have more control over the output. Hope this helps,     Matthew L. AvizinisGleim Publications, Inc.   4201 NW 95th Blvd. Gainesville,

Re: TXTRenderer

2001-10-12 Thread Louis . Masters
Brian: We just started using it. Although it is a bit _ugly_ and the letter spacing is a bit off, our pages are OK. As we get more into TXT output, I'll let you know if I we see this. -Lou "Brian T. Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/11/2001 07:51:49 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

RE: TXTRenderer

2001-10-11 Thread Art Welch
I doubt that anyone is using it for much. It does tend to produce ugly output.   I do not know if any of it's eccentricities have been documented. There was some discussion about it some time back. You could try searching the archives to find it. I do not know if there is anything about it