Christian Geisert wrote:
I haven't had much time recently to work on the next (final)
maintenance release and will be on holiday the next two
weeks (honeymoon ;-)
Hearty congratulations!
but then we really should get the release
out and so I propose the end of the first week of november
as ta
Christian Geisert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't had much time recently to work on the next (final)
> maintenance release and will be on holiday the next two
> weeks (honeymoon ;-)
Congratulations. The first FOP wedding!
> but then we really should get the release
> out and so I propose the end
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sorry, just want to clarify, so, it will support keep-together in table
> rows, but not in fo blocks right?
Right. No change compared to the current code.
Unless someone does change it, of course.
J.Pietschmann
---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
10/16/2002 12:38 PM Sub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will the maintenance release in the first week of November support the
> keep-together property ?
Yes, in exactly the same way as the current version (table rows only).
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe
Hello,
Will the maintenance release in the first week of November support the
keep-together property ?
Thank You!
Shaifali Prakash
C&HT / Media & Entertainment
San Francisco
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a fair timetable. I have the GRE on Nov. 9th, but after that will have more
time to think clearly (he says knowing full well that after the GRE comes writing the
CV, collecting letters of recommendation, and begging for an RA). A failsafe on the
infinite layout loop should be done by t
Hi all,
I haven't seen anything about the next maintenance release for about a
week now, but I noticed that there had been some discussion about
basic-link problems.
In the meantime, I have improved the basic-link positioning and also
made it work for external-graphic and foreign-inline-object
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is there a way to clear the image cache in FOP 0.2.0.2?
>
> I saw some documentation suggesting a new static method on FopImageFactory
> org.apache.fop.images.FopImageFactory.clearCache();
>
> has this been implemented in newer versions?
Interesting question... looks
I'm willing to do the actual release mechanics any time, apart from
Christmas Eve or Christmas Day. :-) I'd say any time during the 12 Days of
Christmas counts for calling it a "holiday release". :-)
Arved Sandstrom
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Geisert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
I think Xmas release if it is done in the rush may appear to be Halloween
release ;-)
You should consider it will be new year's release.
Even if I would be glad to have some maintenance (REC and so on) I would
not want you to jeopardize this maintenance branch's quality.
Thanks
Cyril
At 18:
11 matches
Mail list logo
