Glen Mazza wrote:
OK -- PDF 1.4 it is. I agree with supporting Acrobat
V5. However, I don't see backwards compatibility
concerns as much of an issue here, given the Acrobat
Reader is free and pretty easy to download.
Glen,
you are right that AR is free and easily available. However, large
1.4 (Copyright 2001) is fine for us.
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preference is similar to Jeremias' preference. I
prefer we move to a
higher requirement(s) when there are clear and
expressed needs for such
moves. In fact, I would prefer we support 1.3 by
default, and only
On Oct 11, 2004, at 7:06 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
1.4 (Copyright 2001) is fine for us.
That's OK by me, as long as that is the consensus and not the opinion
of one of our esteemed committers. I was hoping for a little discussion
about why PDF 1.3 is not even an option? There is some discussion of
Clay,
It's not just the *quantity* of consumers, it is also
their level of happiness, as well as our ability to
recruit developers willing to do the coding. (Absent
committers willing to spend the time on the code, *no*
version of PDF will get supported.) Per your
suggestion, though, if we were
My preference is similar to Jeremias' preference. I prefer we move to a
higher requirement(s) when there are clear and expressed needs for such
moves. In fact, I would prefer we support 1.3 by default, and only
require 1.4 or 1.5 for those items and features which require it. I
admit, my
Do you have a particular reason for this? A feature that you need from
1.5? Most of the people I know who are users of Adobe Acrobat are still
with version 5 which uses PDF 1.4. Only a small number of people have
upgraded their Acrobat Reader to version 6. Start time of AR6 is a PITA
so I
OK -- PDF 1.4 it is. I agree with supporting Acrobat
V5. However, I don't see backwards compatibility
concerns as much of an issue here, given the Acrobat
Reader is free and pretty easy to download.
Thanks,
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a particular reason
Team,
Which version [1] of the PDF spec does FOP follow?
Can HEAD use the most recent, version 1.5 from August
2003?
Thanks,
Glen
[1] http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp
