Re: feature request queue

2002-11-07 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >. . . >Patch queue looks very good, and what about introducing one more queue for >feature requests? >. . . I think these can be identified by the "severity=enhancement" field of bugzilla issues, isn't that sufficient? Ok, here is URL (I'm not sure how to short it):

Re: feature request queue

2002-11-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 14:58, Oleg Tkachenko wrote: >. . . > Patch queue looks very good, and what about introducing one more queue for > feature requests? >. . . I think these can be identified by the "severity=enhancement" field of bugzilla issues, isn't that sufficient? Maybe this mus

feature request queue

2002-11-06 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Hello there! Patch queue looks very good, and what about introducing one more queue for feature requests? We can identify them among other bugzilla entries by something like [FREQ] in a subject line. Last hour I noticed 3 small requests to be considered, but my monitor is full of those "to do"