Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Manifest.java

2001-12-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: now uses built in ant manifest task (under jar) Thanks. I've added a testcase for Ant so that Ant's builds will continue to fail until we fix the problem, and you won't be bothered by GUMP mails any longer. To get the hostname, at least for Windows

Problem in fo:inline background-color

2001-12-14 Thread lpkhoo
Hello, I faced a problem on fo:inline background-color. I using fop0.20.2 to run fo:inline background-color and I found that is not background-color display in my PDF file. It there a way to solved this type of problem?? I hope someone can help me to solved this problem. thank you. lpkhoo

Re: Problem in fo:inline background-color

2001-12-14 Thread spam_from_fop_dev
Hi lpkhoo, background-color on fo:inline doesn't work. See bug 4510: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4510 --Phil. I faced a problem on fo:inline background-color. I using fop0.20.2 to run fo:inline background-color and I found that is not background-color display in my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5431] New: - space attributes don't work in FOP 0.20.2

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5431. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - FOP

2001-12-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, I have updated the build file to use the manifest under jar, works fine. Great! Looking at the hostname I think that it is better left out, it may cause computers to attempt to connect to the internet when resolving the

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - FOP

2001-12-14 Thread Sam Ruby
Stefan Bodewig wrote: I guess my response to your commit message hasn't made it to fop-dev yet. I've manually approved two more messages. Anyone on the fop-dev team want to volunteer to become moderator? My guess is that the current moderator has become backlogged for some reason. There

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - FOP

2001-12-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: I guess my response to your commit message hasn't made it to fop-dev yet. I've manually approved two more messages. Thanks, shouldn't be necessary any longer, I've subscribed to fop-dev shortly after sending my

FOP Javadoc

2001-12-14 Thread John M. Corro
Is there a Javadoc for the FOP classes? Looked around in the distro and online and did find documentation, but was wondering if there was a nice standard Javadoc anywhere. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: FOP Javadoc

2001-12-14 Thread John M. Corro
To clarify...I'm looking for javadoc on the 'org.apache.fop.apps' package as used by the provided servlet example. - Original Message - From: John M. Corro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:52 AM Subject: FOP Javadoc Is there a Javadoc for the

RE: FOP Javadoc

2001-12-14 Thread Dvorák Zdenek
At http://xml.apache.org/fop/dist/ in any file (just unzip it). Zdenek -Original Message- From: John M. Corro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP Javadoc To clarify...I'm looking for javadoc on the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4491] - PCL renderer not rendering tables correctly

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4491. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5430] - pcl table rendering bug

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5430. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)

2001-12-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:05, Matthias Fischer wrote: However, you won't escape big maintenance so easily: Right - maintaining such a test suite is not light work. The advantage over pure documentation, however, is that both users and developers directly benefit from having strong test

Fo inline truncates

2001-12-14 Thread Kunal Mittal
Title: Fo inline truncates Hello - I am using the following code.. How can I prevent the fo:inline from truncating -? fo:table-cell fo:blockRequestor: fo:inline font-weight='normal' font-style='italic' wrap-option='wrap' #TAG_REQUEST# /fo:inline /fo:block /fo:table-cell Thanks

Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)

2001-12-14 Thread Carmelo Montanez
Hi all: Regarding the FO test suite. We at NIST in conjunction with the W3C Developed a test suite for FO. The site is: www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/ We are also working on expanding that work to include ALL of the basic aspects of the language. We expect to have close to 5000 tests