Hello,
how difficult would it be to implement widows and orphans control for
current maintenance release ?
TIA,
Greg
Gregor Mirai wrote:
Hello,
how difficult would it be to implement widows and orphans control for
current maintenance release ?
Very difficult. Thats why the developers decided a redesign was required
in order to implement keeps etc. The maintenance code is mostly frozen
now, whilst developmen
Hello,
FOA (Formatting Object Authoring tool)
http://foa.sourceforge.net
has a new release: 0.6.0.
The major feature of this new release is the Multi-Channel Publishing
capabilities.
Author once and publish on multiple channels. FOA automatically generates a
vesion of the XSL-T for Web pu
I'm resending this mail since it hasn't yet shown up in the archives.
I'm sorry about any duplicates.
[John Austin]
4) Changed the handling of strings at the for-loop storing the
attributes received from the parser in startElement( ... )
// Process attributes
for (int i=0; i
Finn Bock wrote:
new DefaultMutableTreeNode(("Attribute (name = '" +
atts.getLocalName(i) +
"', value = '" +
atts.getValue(i) +
"')").intern() );
Here y
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 12:59, Finn Bock wrote:
> I'm resending this mail since it hasn't yet shown up in the archives.
> I'm sorry about any duplicates.
>
> [John Austin]
>
> > 4) Changed the handling of strings at the for-loop storing the
> >attributes received from the parser in startElemen
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 14:04, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Finn Bock wrote:
> >> new DefaultMutableTreeNode(("Attribute (name = '" +
> >>atts.getLocalName(i) +
> >>"', value = '" +
> >>
--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, as Glenn noticed, the attribute names can
> also be implemented with
> > enumeration
>
> There are no enumerations in pre 1.5 Java. What was
> meant was that
> strings denoting XSLFO property enumeration tokens
> can be interned
> as the se
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 16:43, Glen Mazza wrote:
> --- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But, as Glenn noticed, the attribute names can
> > also be implemented with
> > > enumeration
> >
> > There are no enumerations in pre 1.5 Java. What was
> > meant was that
> > strings denoting
[Glen Mazza]
No I was actually thinking static final variables, my
reference to "enumerations" was in a generic sense:
public static final int PROPA = 1;
public static final int PROPB = 2;
public static final int PROPC = 3;
That was also what I though you meant.
Please accept my apology for missp
[John Austin]
I wondered how much chaining there has to be before performance
gets really bad when I checked your program more closely. Your
example program would produce external chains of length:
200/20011 ~ 100.
I can see performance slow down well before 100.000 unique string are
intern
11 matches
Mail list logo
