DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[Glen]
This is possibly a question for Finn, but if anyone knows: In our
Constants.java [1], we don't have an property enumeration constant for
inherit. (Go here [2], and search on inherit, you will see it
listed in the Value: section for multiple properties.) Is there any
reason why we
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.0's bookmarks are different from 0.20.5's, the former has
fox:bookmarks as the parent element.
It's been that way in 1.0 for a long time,
before I came on board I believe.
Yes, and it even has been discussed this
OK, I see, thanks.
Glen
- Original Message -
From: Finn Bock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: Do we need an inherit enumeration constant?
[Glen]
This is possibly a question for Finn, but if anyone knows: In our
Clay Leeds wrote:
I'm contemplating adding the following products to the FOP Resources
page:
- FOray
- Defoe
...while I'm at it, I might as well add:
- RenderX - XEP
- AntennaHouse - XSL Formatter
Thanks for doing that Clay. I think this will be good for FOP's users, and
it should be
On Nov 22, 2004, at 5:56 PM, Victor Mote wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
I'm contemplating adding the following products to the FOP Resources
page:
- FOray
- Defoe
...while I'm at it, I might as well add:
- RenderX - XEP
- AntennaHouse - XSL Formatter
Thanks for doing that Clay. I think this will be good
