Re: Unix and FOP ?

2002-04-13 Thread John Austin
On Friday 12 April 2002 22:43, you wrote: yep The only area that Windows is (arguably) superior to Unix is in Graphics and especially FONTS. A consequence of Windows success is the fact that almost all computers have Windows licenses. This lets us use the Windows fonts. You need to have

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2002-04-13 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-13/xml-fop.html Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan2: [copy] Copying 1

Re: Non rendered characters in and around fo:inline tags at pagebreak

2002-04-13 Thread J.Pietschmann
Nicolas Mazziotta wrote: When a fo:inline element occurs at page break, its text() happens not to be rendered.. What can I do? You can post a small FO file demonstrating the problem to the list. J.Pietschmann - To

Re: AW: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-13 Thread Peter B. West
Folks, Please indulge my ignorance again. May I assume that it is not possible to run two main()s in the same VM? From this discussion so far I have gained much more insight into the nervousness about statics. Is the problem that servers want to execute multiple instances of classes

Re: AW: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-13 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote: Please indulge my ignorance again. May I assume that it is not possible to run two main()s in the same VM? Not in the sense you probably mean. From this discussion so far I have gained much more insight into the nervousness about statics. Is the problem that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8050] New: - Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly

2002-04-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8050. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Vote] New committer: Jeremias Maerki

2002-04-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, I would like to propose Jeremias Maerki as a new committert for Fop. Jeremias has already contibuted the PS Renderer and quite a few bugfixes/patches, helped to improve the documentation and is very helpful on the mailing lists. Here is my vote: +1 Christian

RE: [Vote] New committer: Jeremias Maerki

2002-04-13 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Agreed, definitely. +1. I think we want to be generous when proposing and voting on new committers. The main thing is staying power - I can say this even though my efforts have been sparse as of late - and all three nominated individuals have demonstrated plenty of it, to my mind. AHS

Fop with Cocoa Obj-C with Java

2002-04-13 Thread Rich Van Deren ()
I am Fopping now, embedded in an MacOS X Cocoa Application. I am so happy. I will share it with you if you like. I had to write a Cocoa System Service in Java. Took me a while to understand the Apple documentation. The service got rid of Cocoa event problem because of the AWT usage in

Re: Fop with Cocoa Obj-C with Java

2002-04-13 Thread Jim Wright
Hey Rich: I could sure use one. I've been playing with Cocoa myself, and facing some similar issues in terms of the somewhat abbreviated (to say the least) Apple documentation. Thanks! jw Rich Van Deren (???) wrote: I am Fopping now, embedded in an MacOS X Cocoa Application. I am so

Re: AW: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-13 Thread Peter B. West
Joerg, Thanks, it does answer my questions, and raises a few others. I'm heartened by this, because what you have described is the inappropriate use of global data in a multi-threaded context. I'm interested because I like statics. They are smaller and faster; what's not to like? Before

RE: AW: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-13 Thread Arved Sandstrom
-Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 13, 2002 11:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AW: Multithreading FOP ? [ SNIP ] It seems to me, of what I have heard so far, that there is no problem with statics _per se_. If they are used with