Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion

2002-05-02 Thread Keiron Liddle
I agree with you (except for the last statment about one line). I found this statement interesting: 6.6.7. fo:inline An fo:inline that is a child of an fo:footnote may not have block-level children. An fo:inline that is a descendant of an fo:leader or of the fo:inline child of an fo:footnote

Re: Czech translation for AWT viewer

2002-05-02 Thread Christian Geisert
Buchtk, Michal wrote: Hi Fops, I translate messages and resources for AWT viewer, can you commit it? It's in ISO-8859-2 coding. Does this work with current maintenance branch (or 0.20.3 final) ? The reason I'm asking is that the enconding of the resources has been changed to utf-8 with fop

RE: Czech translation for AWT viewer

2002-05-02 Thread Buchtk, Michal
Hi, i forgot for encoding change. I convert it to UTF-8 a test it with current maintain branch. It works ok. See new attachment. Thanks for notice. Michal -Original Message- From: Christian Geisert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/viewer/resources messages.cs resources.cs

2002-05-02 Thread chrisg
chrisg 02/05/02 04:01:22 Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain CHANGES Added: src/org/apache/fop/viewer/resources Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain messages.cs resources.cs Log: Added czech translation for AWT viewer Submitted by: Michal Buchtik

Master reference for fo:page-sequence

2002-05-02 Thread claes . bergsten
When trying to process my fo-file I get the following error: FATAL ERROR: 'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence'matches no 'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' My header looks like this and is copy/pasted from the examples ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? fo:root

Re: Czech translation for AWT viewer

2002-05-02 Thread Christian Geisert
Buchtk, Michal wrote: Hi, i forgot for encoding change. I convert it to UTF-8 a test it with current maintain branch. It works ok. See new attachment. Committed, thanks for your contribution. Thanks for notice. Michal Christian

Re: Master reference for fo:page-sequence

2002-05-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Your stylesheet still uses pre-Recommendation XSL:FO. Please see the release notes for instructions to resolve this: http://xml.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html When trying to process my fo-file I get the following error: FATAL ERROR: 'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence'matches no

Configuration mods to allow embedded apps to change font base path in userconfig

2002-05-02 Thread Brian O'Kelley
Title: Message Hi all, Sorry in advance if I'm not doing this right, it's my first official contribution (or attempt thereof) to FOP! I ran into issues where my servlet was getting installed and run from a number of locations, making the relative paths in fop-userconfig.xml not work, so

Shrink oversized pages to paper size

2002-05-02 Thread David Frankson
I have a fo document for printing mailing labels and positioning on the printed document needs to be exact. FOP generates a perfectly spaced PDF document, but when I print it, Acrobat scales it down a bit and throws the whole thing off. Digging around I found that unchecking "Shrink

Re: Shrink oversized pages to paper size

2002-05-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
David Frankson wrote: I have a fo document for printing mailing labels and positioning on the printed document needs to be exact. FOP generates a perfectly spaced PDF document, but when I print it, Acrobat scales it down a bit and throws the whole thing off. Digging around I found that

What the spec says about table-row, table-cell etc.

2002-05-02 Thread Chuck Paussa
I've been working on a schema for FO documents so that I can off-load the validation chore. I created the schema from the W3C documents which state the following for table-cell: Contents: (%block;)+ In addition this formatting object may have a sequence of zero or more fo:markers as its

FOP has not implemented defined enumerated attribute values

2002-05-02 Thread Chuck Paussa
I wrote a test document that implemented all of the enumerated values for block attributes. Here are the results where FOP complained. All of the other enumerated values seem to be implemented. For the value inherit FOP implements inheritability. It just doesn't recognize the inherit

RE: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion

2002-05-02 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Comments inline...actually, no, they're not, they are really block-stacking, but you get the drift. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karen Lease Sent: May 2, 2002 7:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout

RE: What the spec says about table-row, table-cell etc.

2002-05-02 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Comments below. -Original Message- From: Chuck Paussa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: May 2, 2002 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What the spec says about table-row, table-cell etc. I've been working on a schema for FO documents so that I can off-load the validation

Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion

2002-05-02 Thread Peter B. West
Arved, This is a good idea. I half-heartedly suggested as much to Matthew Huggett when he asked what a non-programming technical writer might contribute. It requires too deep an insight into the spec, but he (or Cyril) may of some assistance to you. What would be even more generally useful