Please Add ! And thanks for noticing this.
Dw
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Peter B. West wrote:
I have just noticed that there is no licence in build.xml, build.bat or
build.sh. I assume this is an oversight, or do we have a dispensation?
I've read an FAQ entry a while back. I think we just have to remove the
build directory on cvs.apache.org to get rid of the problem. Eclipse
ignores parts of the cvsignore file if there are files on the CVS server
in ignored directories.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10476297623r=1w=2
BTW:
This may need more work before proceeding---I've
looked at Xalan, Cocoon, Axis--none of them are
licensing their shell scripts and batch files--nor
their to-do lists and related files--so if this is an
oversight with us--so it is with everyone.
Two (Xalan and Axis) do have a copyright statement
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Glen Mazza wrote:
their to-do lists and related files--so if this is an
oversight with us--so it is with everyone.
Which is no reason not to fix i in fop-dev ASAP. We're an open source
project; and the ASF needs every bit of help they can in making sure that
we dot our
Wow, mails like this make me find new hope. Maybe I should resume my
crusade to improve licensing policies at Apache and clarify open
questions.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing updated with this
new piece of information (copyright years, which was an open question
there).
Also references on that Wiki page to source code
files and files part of a project's codebase [i.e.,
those that need the license] should be further
clarified to be any file checked into CVS for a
project.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, mails like this make me find new
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Glen Mazza wrote:
clarified to be any file checked into CVS for a
project.
Well - at the very least it is more each and every 'granule' which the
committer community (i.e the developers) would consider its work or its
creation. So at the same time one has some leeway to
Oh, good--we're in agreement here. (Usually not good
for one to argue too much with the President,
non-profit or not ;)
Glen
--- Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Glen Mazza wrote:
clarified to be any file checked into CVS for a
project.
Well - at
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Glen Mazza wrote:
Oh, good--we're in agreement here. (Usually not good for one to argue
too much with the President, non-profit or not ;)
You are safer off ignoring that silly hat of mine altogether most of the
time - and consider me just one of your peers (though
gmazza 2003/07/06 14:23:50
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs compliance.xml
Log:
Typo fixed.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +1 -1 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.xml
Index: compliance.xml
gmazza 2003/07/06 14:53:40
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs logocontest.xml
Log:
Typo cleanup.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +9 -9 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/logocontest.xml
Index: logocontest.xml
gmazza 2003/07/06 15:02:31
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow PageNumber.java
PageNumberCitation.java
Log:
Non-applicable white-space-collapse property removed from fo:page-number and
fo:page-number-citation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
vmote 2003/07/06 15:38:44
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/datatypes KeepValue.java Length.java
LengthBase.java LengthPair.java LengthRange.java
LinearCombinationLength.java MixedLength.java
PercentBase.java
Team,
Two new changes I would next like to make to the trunk
branch--These are unrelated, separate votes:
(1.) I would like to remove the addToBuilder()
function (and update its subclasses) from the
ElementMapping interface and replace it with
getNamespaceURI() and getFOTable() functions (and
vmote 2003/07/06 16:27:56
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr LayoutHandler.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/rtf/rtflib/rtfdoc RtfBefore.java
RtfExtraRowSet.java RtfFile.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/util ASCII85OutputStream.java
Hello,
I'm new to this list, but have been using Fop to render a DocBook documentation suite
for the last year. I finally got around to using the Ant Task and created a patch to
only render the output file(s) if they are older than the input .fo file(s). I also
added a force attribute
vmote 2003/07/06 17:39:40
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/rtf/rtflib/rtfdoc
RtfExtraRowSet.java
Log:
clean up javadoc warning (can't reference
org.apache.fop.rtf.rtflib.testdocs.NestedTable because it is not marked public)
Revision ChangesPath
vmote 2003/07/06 19:09:24
Modified:.build.xml
Added: src/java/org/apache/fop/rtf/rtflib package.html
src/java/org/apache/fop/rtf/rtflib/exceptions package.html
src/java/org/apache/fop/rtf/rtflib/interfaces package.html
vmote 2003/07/06 21:04:55
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml
Added: src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev rtflib.xml
Log:
Add some basic documentation for RTFLib (aka jfor).
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +3 -0
vmote 2003/07/06 21:30:40
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev rtflib.xml
Log:
Fix type in URL
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev/rtflib.xml
Index: rtflib.xml
21 matches
Mail list logo
