Re: FOs and Areas

2003-12-20 Thread Peter B. West
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.Pietschmann wrote:

I've got a lot of ideas myself, perhaps too many. What the
project needs is *working* *code*.
Working code is predicated on working ideas, is it not?  That's why I 
asked about ideas.



Not necessarily (--that, I believe, is Victor's whole point). You can have perfectly working software, which turns out to be poorly designed, and the biggest problem there is that the flaws in the design will almost always turn up at a moment when it's least convenient to change it (we'll leave the name-dropping to _your_ imagination ;) )
My meaning was that software doesn't write itself - all software is 
thought into existence (even software from code generators.)

I agree with your final point, with the substitution of 
imperfectly-working for perfectly-working.  (Note - this was a 
conversation with Joerg.)

Peter
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25582] - [PATCH] Remove unused imports.

2003-12-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25582.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25582

[PATCH] Remove unused imports.





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-12-20 12:38 ---
I think that a commit is missing for the last 5 files in the patch:

src/java/org/apache/fop/render/ps/PSTextPainter.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/render/ps/PSXMLHandler.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/svg/AbstractFOPTranscoder.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/svg/PDFImageElementBridge.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/util/CharUtilities.java

Or maybe the patch file wasn't applied completely for these files.

regards,
finn


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25673] New: - [PATCH] access to fobj.elementTable cause eclipse warning.

2003-12-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25673.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25673

[PATCH] access to fobj.elementTable cause eclipse warning.

   Summary: [PATCH] access to fobj.elementTable cause eclipse
warning.
   Product: Fop
   Version: 1.0dev
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
  Severity: Minor
  Priority: Other
 Component: general
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I don't know to what extend we want to fix eclipse warnings, but by default 
eclipse complains about access to static fields through an instance variable.

This patch fixes this and removes an unneeded import statement.


RE: Setup code in Driver

2003-12-20 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote (Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 8:28 AM)

 As you may have seen in the CVS messages I have moved most of the setup
 code that was in the render() method to the getContentHandler() method.
 This is necessary because not everyone uses the render() methods,
 sometimes you simply need to have a ContentHandler to send SAX events to.
 Some of our examples (and some of our basic test cases) use that
 approach.

 What is left to do is to enable the FOTreeListener for Document that is
 currently added only if the render() method is called. Providing the
 same functionality with getContentHandler() only means you're not in the
 Driver class anymore when endDocument() is called on the ContentHandler
 which makes it difficult to remove the FOTreeListener on the
 FOTreeHandler when processing is complete.

 If noone objects, if noone has a better idea and if noone fixes that
 ahead of me, I'm going to write a ProxyingDefaultHandler as a utility
 class that does nothing other than pass through all method calls to
 another DefaultHandler (in other words: the FOTreeBuilder). I'll then
 add an anonymous inner class derived from that ProxyingDefaultHandler in
 getContentHandler that listens to the endDocument() event and calls
 removeFOTreeListener on FOTreeHandler. Instead of the FOTreeBuilder that
 anonymous inner class will be returned by getContentHandler().

First, my apologies for being so slow to respond. I am trying to clean up
some of this old stuff that I had flagged for followup. I also looked in the
CVS history  source, and it looks like you have not finished this yet.

The answer to your question probably lies in understanding how and why
getContentHandler() is used without also using render(). The FOTreeListener
is only needed if the input document is parsed, and in fact is only needed
if you want to break out of parsing to go do something at a higher level
before returning (the normal SAX events are not affected at all). So:
1) if the process running getContentHandler() doesn't ever parse, don't
bother registering the FOTreeListener
2) if the process running getContentHandler() doesn't care about being
notified about the end of a PageSequence (which is the only FOTreeListener
event that is *unique*), don't bother registering the FOTreeListener
3) otherwise, have it wrap its parsing code inside of the following (which
is what is wrapped around parser.parse in render() now):
before
if (foInputHandler instanceof FOTreeHandler) {
FOTreeHandler foTreeHandler = (FOTreeHandler)foInputHandler;
foTreeHandler.addFOTreeListener(currentDocument);
}
/before

after
if (foInputHandler instanceof FOTreeHandler) {
FOTreeHandler foTreeHandler = (FOTreeHandler)foInputHandler;
foTreeHandler.removeFOTreeListener(currentDocument);
}
/after

Better yet, refactor both of the above code snippets into methods that can
be called more simply, since this code would now be used more than once.

Just looking at what is left in render(), I don't quite follow why it would
ever *not* be used if parsing will take place. The only thing left in there
is parser.parse(), the above code that it is wrapped in, and the code to
*not* parse based on the LayoutStrategy's wishes. Since the parser itself
can be passed as a parameter, it seems like anybody parsing could/would use
it. If you will describe the use case(s) a bit, I'll try to be of more help.

Part of what is making this a bit ugly is that render() really belongs in
the Document class, but I don't think that can be done until FOP's API
issues are resolved.

Victor Mote



RE: Suppression of leading space

2003-12-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
 -Original Message-
 From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

snip /

 The space constraints probably (hopefully )only applies to
 space specifiers on the FOs itself, i.e if I had written
   fo:inline space-end=2pt...
 Space characters ought to be another matter.

 Try:
   fo:block background-color=red font-size=20pt
 fo:inline background-color=blue font-size=10ptfoo
 /fo:inlinefo:inline background-color=green
  font-size=15pt bar/fo:inline/fo:block


Arghh! First hadn't even noticed the lf after foo...

Should it make a difference whether you write:

fo:inline ...sth/fo:inline

or

fo:inline ...sth
/fo:inline

or

fo:inline ...
sth
/fo:inline

Doesn't that depend ... ? (I'm trying to see on what exactly)

Using the default values for the related properties (see Finn's OP), space
would *always* remain for the latter two cases. Now, don't know for sure
what's considered to be best practice, but maybe the only way to really
'solve' the original issue, would be at the FO level. Just advise everyone
to use LF rather in the markup itself (like in your example, the second
fo:inline).

So if, in the last case here above, one *really* needs to avoid trailing and
leading spaces, one could rearrange it like (most extreme case) :

fo:inline ...
sth/fo:inline

or

fo:inline ...
someverylongphraserunningthroughtotheendofthepagewhichiseemtobeunabletoachi
eveatthemoment
/fo:inline

So, in short, no LF between  and the start of the content, nor between the
end of the content and .

Perfectly admitted.

Cheers,

Andreas



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25673] - [PATCH] access to fobj.elementTable cause eclipse warning.

2003-12-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25673.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25673

[PATCH] access to fobj.elementTable cause eclipse warning.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-12-20 16:11 ---
Fixed.  You'll see shortly--thanks, Glen.


RE: Setup code in Driver

2003-12-20 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote:

  The answer to your question probably lies in understanding how and why
  getContentHandler() is used without also using render(). The
 FOTreeListener
  is only needed if the input document is parsed, and in fact is
 only needed
  if you want to break out of parsing to go do something at a higher level
  before returning (the normal SAX events are not affected at all). So:
  1) if the process running getContentHandler() doesn't ever parse, don't
  bother registering the FOTreeListener

 Does that ever happen? I would assume that anyone who calls
 getContentHandler() will want to send SAX events. I don't think I
 understand what you're trying to explain. Sorry.

I don't know whether it happens or not. I can't think of a reason for this
to be done. Since I don't understand how this is getting used, I was just
trying to cover all possibilities.

  2) if the process running getContentHandler() doesn't care about being
  notified about the end of a PageSequence (which is the only
 FOTreeListener
  event that is *unique*), don't bother registering the FOTreeListener

 Ok, I guess that is something that was introduced by your LayoutStrategy.
 Would you explain to me what you mean by process in this context?

It is only loosely related to LayoutStrategy. It had more to do with trying
to separate the parsing and layout (somewhat foundational to LayoutStrategy,
but useful even apart from that). fo.FOTreeEvent and fo.FOTreeListener kind
of mimic what the SAX events do, but are fired from within FOP as the FOTree
is being built. This allows FOTree to do its thing without needing to know
how it is being used.

By process I just mean whatever embedded application is calling
getContentHandler().

  3) otherwise, have it wrap its parsing code inside of the
 following (which
  is what is wrapped around parser.parse in render() now):
  before
  if (foInputHandler instanceof FOTreeHandler) {
  FOTreeHandler foTreeHandler =
 (FOTreeHandler)foInputHandler;
  foTreeHandler.addFOTreeListener(currentDocument);
  }
  /before
 
  after
  if (foInputHandler instanceof FOTreeHandler) {
  FOTreeHandler foTreeHandler =
 (FOTreeHandler)foInputHandler;
  foTreeHandler.removeFOTreeListener(currentDocument);
  }
  /after
 
  Better yet, refactor both of the above code snippets into
 methods that can
  be called more simply, since this code would now be used more than once.

 As methods of Document?

Since the code is in Driver now, I was thinking Driver. However, it will
work from Document also. You'll just need to use getDriver() to get to the
foInputHandler.

  Just looking at what is left in render(), I don't quite follow
 why it would
  ever *not* be used if parsing will take place. The only thing
 left in there
  is parser.parse(), the above code that it is wrapped in, and the code to
  *not* parse based on the LayoutStrategy's wishes. Since the
 parser itself
  can be passed as a parameter, it seems like anybody parsing
 could/would use
  it. If you will describe the use case(s) a bit, I'll try to be
 of more help.

 Use cases that are not using render? Most prominent use case is Cocoon
 which build a SAX pipeline where FOP can be the end of that pipeline. So
 Cocoon needs a ContentHandler. Cocoon will not be able to call the
 render() method. Personally, I have never used FOP's render() method as
 a FOP user. I've always worked with getContentHandler(). I guess the
 Cocoon use-case should be enough to convince you that the
 getContentHandler() is necessary.

The only thing going on in render right now is parser.parse(). Based on your
above answer to #1, Cocoon must be doing something like that internally???
And based on your answer immediately above, it absolutely cannot use
render() to do that. Although I don't grasp why this should be true, taking
it at face value, and assuming that we want FOP to layout this document,
here are the options:
1. The equivalent of parser.parse() that exists in the embedded app (Cocoon)
will need to be wrapped in the code that activates the FOTreeListener. The
code in render() that checks to see whether the LayoutStrategy wants to
build an FOTree or not probably needs to be included as well, and again, it
should probably be extracted into a method, or included in the before
method. (This was the code I recently added to accommodate alt-design so
that it could create its own data structure instead of using FOTree).
2. The FOTreeListener concept can be abandoned. Simply restore to the
original scheme, which had the FOTree start the layout process for the
PageSequence as parsing was completed for it. I don't remember exactly where
that is, but it is wherever the FOTreeEvent is being fired. Here are the
costs that I can think of to this approach:
  a. Either LayoutStrategy needs to be abandoned, or the LayoutStrategy
implementation needs to be made 

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java PropertyList.java

2003-12-20 Thread gmazza
gmazza  2003/12/20 09:40:01

  Modified:.build.xml
   src/java/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java PropertyList.java
  Added:   src/codegen fo-property-mapping.xsl
  Removed: src/codegen propmap.xsl
  Log:
  Property Makers now being activated via int constants.  (Maker classes themselves, 
as well as code referencing the properties, still need conversion to int's.  Also, 
HashMaps for String and Integer in FOPropertyMapping and FObj temporarily being 
retained for troubleshooting purposes.)  Contribution mainly from Finn Bock (Bug 
#25480).
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.94  +1 -2  xml-fop/build.xml
  
  Index: build.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/build.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.93
  retrieving revision 1.94
  diff -u -r1.93 -r1.94
  --- build.xml 15 Dec 2003 01:07:50 -  1.93
  +++ build.xml 20 Dec 2003 17:40:01 -  1.94
  @@ -209,7 +209,6 @@
   property name=colorkw.xml value=${build.codegen}/colorkw.xml/
   
   property name=properties.xsl value=${build.codegen}/properties.xsl/
  -property name=propmap.xsl value=${build.codegen}/propmap.xsl/
   property name=enumgen.xsl value=${build.codegen}/enumgen.xsl/
   property name=propinc.xsl value=${build.codegen}/propinc.xsl/
   property name=src.charlist.xsl 
value=${src.codegen}/code-point-mapping.xsl/
  @@ -354,7 +353,7 @@
   
   style in=${foproperties.xml} style=${properties.xsl}
   out=${build.gensrc}/${replacestring}/fo/properties/fo_${ignore_this}/
  -style in=${foproperties.xml} style=${propmap.xsl}
  +style in=${foproperties.xml} style=${build.codegen}/fo-property-mapping.xsl
   
out=${build.gensrc}/${replacestring}/fo/properties/FOPropertyMapping.java/
   style in=${foproperties.xml} style=${enumgen.xsl}
   
out=${build.gensrc}/${replacestring}/fo/properties/foenums_${ignore_this}/
  
  
  
  1.1  xml-fop/src/codegen/fo-property-mapping.xsl
  
  Index: fo-property-mapping.xsl
  ===
  !--
  $Id: fo-property-mapping.xsl,v 1.1 2003/12/20 17:40:01 gmazza Exp $
  
 The Apache Software License, Version 1.1
  
  
  Copyright (C) 1999-2003 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
  
  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modifica-
  tion, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
  
  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
 this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
  
  2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
 this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
 and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
  
  3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if any, must
 include the following acknowledgment: This product includes software
 developed by the Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if
 and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear.
  
  4. The names FOP and Apache Software Foundation must not be used to
 endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior
 written permission. For written permission, please contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  5. Products derived from this software may not be called Apache, nor may
 Apache appear in their name, without prior written permission of the
 Apache Software Foundation.
  
  THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,
  INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
  FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
  APACHE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
  INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLU-
  DING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS
  OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
  ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
  (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
  THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
  
  
  This software consists of voluntary contributions made by many individuals
  on behalf of the Apache Software Foundation and was originally created by
  James Tauber [EMAIL PROTECTED]. For more information on the Apache
  Software Foundation, please see http://www.apache.org/.
  -- 
  xsl:stylesheet version=1.0
   

AW: AW: What should I be doing ?

2003-12-20 Thread J.U. Anderegg
Christian Ziesemer wrote:

 Do you know other projects dealing with high quality typesetting with
 Java or if Java 1.5 will bring improvements? I'm thinking about writing
 my diploma thesis about how to extend the current/implement a
 typesetting API for Java.

Batik extends text attributes with kerning, word and character spacing. The
beauty of pure Java2D text is : you do not have to preprocess fonts files
and to deal with glyph metrics. If you want I will send you my font test
program. There will be a Java2D text rework in Java 1.5 to eliminate bugs
and improve some internals.

What is your idea of a typesetting API? Something like a FOP renderer
interface, storing a document as graphics objects in memory, a formatter?

Hansuli Anderegg




cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties TextDecoration.java Property.java Background.java

2003-12-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest  2003/12/20 17:38:52

  Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/configuration Tag:
FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design Configuration.java
   src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Tag:
FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design TextDecoration.java
Property.java Background.java
  Log:
  Removed unnecessary semi-colons on advice from Eclipse.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  No   revision
  No   revision
  1.1.2.2   +1 -2  
xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/configuration/Attic/Configuration.java
  
  Index: Configuration.java
  ===
  RCS file: 
/home/cvs/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/configuration/Attic/Configuration.java,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
  diff -u -r1.1.2.1 -r1.1.2.2
  --- Configuration.java5 Jul 2003 19:05:39 -   1.1.2.1
  +++ Configuration.java21 Dec 2003 01:38:52 -  1.1.2.2
  @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@
* stores the configuration information
*/
   private static HashMap standardConfiguration = new HashMap(30);
  -;
   private static HashMap pdfConfiguration = new HashMap(20);
   private static HashMap awtConfiguration = new HashMap(20);
   
  
  
  
  No   revision
  No   revision
  1.1.2.2   +2 -2  
xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/TextDecoration.java
  
  Index: TextDecoration.java
  ===
  RCS file: 
/home/cvs/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/TextDecoration.java,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
  diff -u -r1.1.2.1 -r1.1.2.2
  --- TextDecoration.java   5 Jul 2003 19:22:24 -   1.1.2.1
  +++ TextDecoration.java   21 Dec 2003 01:38:52 -  1.1.2.2
  @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 ,LINE_THROUGH = 4
,BLINK = 8
   
  -   ,ALL_DECORATIONS = UNDERLINE | OVERLINE | LINE_THROUGH | BLINK;
  +   ,ALL_DECORATIONS = UNDERLINE | OVERLINE | LINE_THROUGH | BLINK
   ;
   
   
  
  
  
  1.1.2.2   +4 -4  
xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/Property.java
  
  Index: Property.java
  ===
  RCS file: 
/home/cvs/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/Property.java,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
  diff -u -r1.1.2.1 -r1.1.2.2
  --- Property.java 5 Jul 2003 19:22:26 -   1.1.2.1
  +++ Property.java 21 Dec 2003 01:38:52 -  1.1.2.2
  @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@
   
   try {
   colorFound = new ColorType(colorProp, ncname);
  -} catch (PropertyException e) {};
  +} catch (PropertyException e) {}
   if (colorFound != null) {
   if (color != null) MessageHandler.logln(propName +
   : duplicate color overrides previous color);
  
  
  
  1.1.2.2   +4 -4  
xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/Background.java
  
  Index: Background.java
  ===
  RCS file: 
/home/cvs/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/Attic/Background.java,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
  diff -u -r1.1.2.1 -r1.1.2.2
  --- Background.java   5 Jul 2003 19:22:22 -   1.1.2.1
  +++ Background.java   21 Dec 2003 01:38:52 -  1.1.2.2
  @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
try {
colorval = new ColorType
(PropNames.BACKGROUND_COLOR, ncname);
  - } catch (PropertyException e) {};
  + } catch (PropertyException e) {}
if (colorval != null) {
if (color != null) MessageHandler.log(background:  +
duplicate color overrides previous color);
  @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
try {
enum = new EnumType
(PropNames.BACKGROUND_ATTACHMENT, ncname);
  - } catch (PropertyException e) {};
  + } catch (PropertyException e) {}
if (enum != null) {
if (attachment != null)
MessageHandler.log(background: duplicate +
  @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
Object tmpo = elements.previous();
}
}
  - } catch (PropertyException e) {};
  + } catch (PropertyException e) {}
   
if (pos1ok) {
if (position != null)
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cvs commit: xml-fop .project

2003-12-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest  2003/12/20 17:41:52

  Modified:.Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design .project
  Log:
  Meta-file update for Eclipse
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  No   revision
  No   revision
  1.1.2.3   +8 -2  xml-fop/Attic/.project
  
  Index: .project
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/Attic/.project,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.3
  diff -u -r1.1.2.2 -r1.1.2.3
  --- .project  9 Jul 2003 00:30:50 -   1.1.2.2
  +++ .project  21 Dec 2003 01:41:52 -  1.1.2.3
  @@ -1,13 +1,19 @@
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
   projectDescription
  - namefop-alt.design/name
  + nameFOP_Alt-Design/name
comment/comment
projects
/projects
buildSpec
buildCommand
  - 
namecom.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle.CheckstyleBuilder/name
  + nameorg.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ExternalToolBuilder/name
arguments
  + dictionary
  + keyLaunchConfigHandle/key
  + valuelt;?xml version=quot;1.0quot; 
encoding=quot;UTF-8quot;?gt;
  +lt;launchConfiguration local=quot;falsequot; 
path=quot;/FOP_Alt-Design/.externalToolBuilders/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle.CheckstyleBuilder.launchquot;/gt;
  +/value
  + /dictionary
/arguments
/buildCommand
buildCommand
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Setup code in Driver

2003-12-20 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Also, if possible, please let me know what you
 decide. I am evaluating
 in-progress projects right now to determine which
 ones I should finish and
 which ones I should abandon as I exit the project.

You've mentioned before, I believe, there was some
things you wished to do to improve the fonts.  That
may be good--because most of us have not researched
them.

 If LayoutStrategy
 survives reasonably intact, I am much inclined to
 try to complete the port
 of the pioneer LS. 

I'd rather you not.  I don't want to have to maintain
the 0.20.x layout strategy in addition to the 1.0
strategy in 1.0.  The committers and contributors
(Simon and Chris, in particular) are happy working on
the improving 1.0 layout and wish to remain with it.

Recent patches (hyphenation, borders) to 1.0 LS have
made 0.20.x even more behind.  Also, the 1.0 Area Tree
and Renderers are incompatible with 0.20.x LS, I don't
want their architectures changed in order to
accomodate it.

Those who wish to use the 0.20.x layout strategy can
continue to run 0.20.x.

Let the decision to bring in that LS be with the ones
who will have to maintain it.  As for me, getting one
LS right is more than enough work.

Glen


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/