Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 25.05.2004 01:46:50:
However, since these same fonts could also be used by the PostScript
renderer, or the Print or AWT renderers (assuming that the pfb is
available
as well), I don't see a need to duplicate their definitions, or metrics,
or
anything
Simon Pepping wrote:
snip/
No exceptions. I ran Luca's test fo files successfully.
Strange how you and I always get such different results. It doesnt run with
any file despite changing the language to en. I always get NPE on LLM:249.
Looking at the code it would appear to be a mistake as NPE
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Here is the stack trace, which is the same for both documents:
[...]
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
JThe method startParagraphs dereferences only knuthParagraphs and
textIndent, so maybe there is a missing line concerning their initialization.
KnuthParagraphs (the
Simon Pepping wrote:
I changed the constructor call as well. I changed the logger calls
from getLogger() to log. log is a member of
AbstractLayoutManager. These are changes applied by Glen, and
apparently Luca made his diff before they were applied.
Yes; more exactly, I forgot to apply
Peter B. West wrote:
snip/
Simon, yes! That's what branching is there for. People seem to be
afraid of it, but it is an enormously useful tool for just such
situations. I think it's always a good idea to tag the tree immediately
before a branch.
Hi Peter,
its not that I am afraid of
Luca Furini wrote:
JThe method startParagraphs dereferences only knuthParagraphs and
textIndent, so maybe there is a missing line concerning their initialization.
I have proved that textIndent is definitely null when it is not specified on
the block.
snip/
While textIndent is initialized in the
Luca Furini wrote:
You are completely right; by the way, what other child LMs could the LLM
have?
I'm just guessing, but I think anything that can appear inline, i.e.
hyperlinks, leaders, etc. Block level stuff like Tables and graphics can not
be children of the LLM.
I do not believe that the
Team,
thanks to everyone who agreed to hold off commits until the fate of Luca's
patch had been decided. I think everyone is in agreement that this first patch
needs more work, so I will re-sync with CVS. Therefore, it is safe to make
commits to HEAD once more.
Thanks,
Chris
Clay Leeds wrote:
BTW, Anyone else seeing sporadic mail issues? I didn't actually
*receive* Andreas' message. (I noticed in MARC, and am responding before
I go home).
Hi Clay - I noticed that the mailing lists were very slow yesterday, with
responses appearing in MARC well before I received
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Hi Andreas,
its great to have you trying to help with layout.
Adding the necessary activation code to the FObjs to pass these properties
to Layout is easy enough, but I'm still having a bit of difficulty in
'seeing' what needs to be done to handle this in the respective
Arnd Beißner wrote:
Arnd
Yes, but the base-14 fonts for example are not defined for AWT
renderers, since
*only* their metrics is publicly available. Still, in the case of
the
base 14-fonts you can really argue that you want to extend the PDF
model of
(these
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
snip/
Simon, yes! That's what branching is there for. People seem to be
afraid of it, but it is an enormously useful tool for just such
situations. I think it's always a good idea to tag the tree
immediately before a branch.
Hi Peter,
its not that
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Clay,
Thanks for the heads up, Andreas. I'll keep that in mind. Does this
mean one should do something like this for Unix:
That was exactly what I meant, indeed. Not sure whether it's about the shell
script
On May 24, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Victor Mote wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
On the subject of running headless, my experience has been to
pass it off to POSTSCRIPT--which, again in my
experience--runs fine headless.
Off the top of my head, I can't think of a reason that the PostScript
renderer would work
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Luca Furini wrote:
JThe method startParagraphs dereferences only knuthParagraphs and
textIndent, so maybe there is a missing line concerning their
initialization.
I have proved that textIndent is definitely null when it is
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:56:25AM +0100, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Luca Furini wrote:
You are completely right; by the way, what other child LMs could the LLM
have?
I'm just guessing, but I think anything that can appear inline, i.e.
hyperlinks, leaders, etc. Block level stuff like Tables
...should be in place now, thanks to Ted Leung.
Jeremias Maerki
On May 25, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
...should be in place now, thanks to Ted Leung.
Jeremias Maerki
Sweet! Thanks to Ted Leung ( the estimable Jeremias for the
follow-through!)
Web Maestro Clay
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
That was exactly what I meant, indeed. Not sure whether it's about the shell
script interpreting the argument as one string, but anyway, it gets passed
to the Java VM as one argument, and Java itself has no problems dealing with
long file names...
Arguments enclosed in
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Peter,
Arguments enclosed in quotes, either double or single, are passed as a
single argument to the shell script. I'm not sure about Win CMD
systems, but I believe that they do the same
20 matches
Mail list logo
