Fopsters,
I notice that Glen has been progressively adding validity checking to FO
elements. I'll take this opportunity to draw the attention of recent
foppers to an earlier discussion of the relative merits of push vs. pull
parsing in FOP. Alt-design (which I think I will just call FAD in
Peter B. West wrote:
Hi Peter - did you have a good honeymoon?
Fopsters,
I notice that Glen has been progressively adding validity checking to FO
elements. I'll take this opportunity to draw the attention of recent
foppers to an earlier discussion of the relative merits of push vs. pull
Chris,
It was wonderful, thank you. Drive-by tourism of the highest order.
When I have some photos of the wedding and the tour I will post them.
Peter
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
Hi Peter - did you have a good honeymoon?
--
Peter B. West
This went only to general. Must get into the habit of actually reading
the To address. The discussion seems to have migrated to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Finally creating the XML Graphics PMC
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:43:55 +1000
Peter B. West wrote:
Formally, my votes for membership of the XML Graphics PMC are:
Joerg Pietschmann +1
Glen Mazza+1
Jeremias Maerki +1 (conditional on his acceptance of nomination)
Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi everyone,
4. I propose both Vincent Hardy and Thomas DeWeese from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Being new to this VOTING thing, I'm a bit confused. I believe I've made
it clear in a previous message, that I'm in favor of the PROPOSAL to
create the XML Graphics PMC which will be the new 'home' of FOP and
Batik, but I'm unclear on how this
Clay Leeds wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Being new to this VOTING thing, I'm a bit confused. I believe I've made
it clear in a previous message, that I'm in favor of the PROPOSAL to
create the XML Graphics PMC which will be the new 'home' of FOP and
Batik, but I'm unclear
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
