Jeremias Maerki wrote:
So far, I've met Bertrand and Jörg. No surprise as they live within about
120km of my place. :-) It's really interesting what difference it makes
to have someone directly in front of you. Too bad, Skype still doesn't
have video conferencing support. Anyone already using a
On 15.07.2004 18:02:34 Christian Geisert wrote:
What about IRC?
It has the same problems as e-mail when it comes to interpreting
messages. I'm using ICQ and MSN a lot, but that's not what I'm after
here.
And it looks like there will be an ApacheCon Europe .. in 2005 in Stuttgart.
That's very
Glen,
Thanks for your lengthy reply. It makes more sense now. Although I
keep the feeling that this change brings the FO tree building and area
tree building modules closer together than I would prefer.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:20:16PM -0700, Glen Mazza wrote:
AreaTreeHandler
throws
Because, IMO, it allows the user to use the same pattern for virtually
everything:
1. Create a TransformerFactory
2. Create a Transformer and optionally use a stylesheet
3. Specify the Source (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
4. Specify the Result (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
5. Start the
Making these parts into separate components is in line with what I have
in mind when can talk about a shared repository between Batik and FOP. I
hope I can take a good look into what you did later. From a quick look,
however, I wasn't very pleased that you propose to use a lot of statics
in the
Thanks, Simon--I didn't think of this way of solving
the problem--I just modified Jeremias' previous DOM
example. However, I placed the method below
temporarily in the example and committed it before
returning to the Transformer version. This way, we
have a working example should we ever need to
Sounds good.
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because, IMO, it allows the user to use the same
pattern for virtually
everything:
1. Create a TransformerFactory
2. Create a Transformer and optionally use a
stylesheet
3. Specify the Source (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
4. Specify
