Bug report for Fop [2004/08/01]

2004-08-01 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

RE: Switch from AddLMVisitor to FObj.addLayoutManager()

2004-08-01 Thread Victor Mote
Glen Mazza wrote: While I'm implementing the validateChildNode() methods, I would also like to work on removing the AddLMVisitor visitor pattern[1], and revert to our previous method of having the FO's themselves setup the LayoutManagers via addLayoutManager(). (See here [2][3][4] for

Re: Switch from AddLMVisitor to FObj.addLayoutManager()

2004-08-01 Thread J.Pietschmann
Victor Mote wrote: I mention it only to point out the *real* issue in case any real FOP stakeholders are interested. Well, the real stakeholders (aka users) are probably more interested in working footnotes, or multi-column layout. J.Pietschmann

RE: Switch from AddLMVisitor to FObj.addLayoutManager()

2004-08-01 Thread Victor Mote
J.Pietschmann wrote: Well, the real stakeholders (aka users) are probably more interested in working footnotes, or multi-column layout. I don't understand. More interested in working footnotes or multi-column layout than what? Is removing AddLMVisitor an advancement in getting footnotes or