[GUMP@brutus]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2004-10-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 pr

RE: meaning of Area.TreeExt interface

2004-10-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
If you hard code the bookmarks how would you handle the id resolution, as that is done through the area tree. Potentially you could code the bookmarks in other renderers like AWT. -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 25 October 2004 12:26 PM To: [EM

RE: meaning of Area.TreeExt interface

2004-10-24 Thread Glen Mazza
Thanks for the clarification. PDF Bookmarks aren't working currently, so that's what I'm looking at ATM. We may have another object extending the TreeExt interface, should we have a fox:metadata in the future. Still, I wonder if it may be better to do away with this interface and just hardcode

[GUMP@brutus]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2004-10-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 pr

[GUMP@brutus]: Project xml-fop-maintenance (in module xml-fop-maintenance) success

2004-10-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop-maintenance *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project

RE: meaning of Area.TreeExt interface

2004-10-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi Glen, Yes it is sort of #2. I think the naming is along the lines that it is an extension at the tree level, outside the normal formatting areas, not an extension to the area tree as such. In the example of the bookmarks it is an extension that encompasses the whole document (in terms of resol

Re: FObj.bind() SAXParseException

2004-10-24 Thread Finn Bock
[Glen] The FObj.bind() method throws a SAXParseException if this method hasn't been overridden in the FObj subclass. I'm unsure why a subclass override is required (as the javadoc comment for this method indicates)--wouldn't it be OK if we just have an empty method here without the exception (e.g.

Bug report for Fop [2004/10/24]

2004-10-24 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned