DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Finn Bock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only see a need for plugable LMs, but the
AreaFactory patch is so
small that I see no problem with throwing a bone to
Tibor.
regards,
finn
OK, that opinion was what I was trying to get at.
Someone else to second Andreas' feelings on the
Hello fopsters,
so I have finished (and published in bugzilla) the patch which have aroused
quite a discussion around here.
Just a short description:
1) org.apache.fop.area.AreaFactory
- now contains specific create method for each (used) subclass of Area. The
generic Area create(FObj,
--- Tibor Vyletel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fopsters,
so I have finished (and published in bugzilla) the
patch which have aroused
quite a discussion around here.
Just a short description:
1) org.apache.fop.area.AreaFactory
- now contains specific create method for each
(used)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Finn Bock wrote:
Do you mean that the 3 different processors should ideally
report the same validation errors in the same manner? That
can only happen after someone standardize a SAFO API (Simple
API for FO parsing). Until then all implementation will throw
different exceptions, which is
Glen Mazza wrote:
The title centers correctly in 0.20.5, but is left-justified in 1.0.
[...]
Luca, are you looking at this issue of text alignment in general?
Yes, this happens when the text is short and the algorithm is not able to
find a set of breaking points: the fallback method can't
I am impressed by your seemingly boundless dedication
to XSL and its related fields.
Glen
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually toyed with this idea about two weeks ago.
IIRC, the SAFO name is
already taken, but at the time I registered the
axsl.org domain, and I
finally went
--- Luca Furini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another way is to use, instead of
considerLegalBreak(), a different method
to evaluate a possible break point if no breakpoints
are found: this
alternative method would be much simpler, and would
re-create the
behaviour of the old getNextBreakPoss
Victor Mote wrote:
Finn Bock wrote:
Do you mean that the 3 different processors should ideally
report the same validation errors in the same manner? That
can only happen after someone standardize a SAFO API (Simple
API for FO parsing). Until then all implementation will throw
different
On Oct 9, 2004, at 1:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip what=wiki-stuff
While we're talking about volunteers, when the resolution passes we
will
have some work to do, creating a charter, setting up a website for XML
Graphics which will link to the two existing websites under XML and a
few other
Very nice--I like the xmlgraphics logo, and the layout of the text is
well done. I think in general having fewer pages but of higher quality
is preferable.
Glen
Clay Leeds wrote:
On Oct 9, 2004, at 1:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip what=wiki-stuff
While we're talking about volunteers, when
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5001.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Victor,
from the website I don't quite get the scope of the project. That might
have to be made clearer. Anyway, I didn't want to talk about it just yet,
because it's not ready, but recently I started writing a JAXP-like API
for XSL-FO processors (I called in JAFOP for now). It basically
No, I don't think Luca has write access, yet. I know by now that the CLA
is recorded but the account hasn't been created, yet, although I've
already sent a reminder.
On 04.11.2004 23:59:52 Glen Mazza wrote:
Please do--this solution sounds great! (BTW, you have
write access already, correct?)
17 matches
Mail list logo
