Re: Apache XMLGraphics 'blurb' for ApacheCon 2004

2004-11-08 Thread Glen Mazza
I signed up for ApacheCon last night so I'll be there next week. Glen - Original Message - From: Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 12:09 AM Subject: Fwd: Apache XMLGraphics 'blurb' for ApacheCon 2004 FYI, I just sent this msg to Tina

Re: XMLGraphics temp site up (was Re: Can we please disable the Wiki on Nagoya?)

2004-11-08 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi Guys, Well, I must admit to not being really excited by the new logo. Not to hurt people's feelings, note that it is good, but I think it could be better. None of these are really strong held but are my opinions. As it currently is I actually prefer the 'non svg shapes' version as

Re: Apache XMLGraphics 'blurb' for ApacheCon 2004

2004-11-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 8, 2004, at 5:44 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: I signed up for ApacheCon last night so I'll be there next week. Glen Wish I could be there to meet you, Glen. Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webmaster/Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com/ PGP Public Key:

Re: XMLGraphics temp site up

2004-11-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 8, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Thomas DeWeese wrote: Hi Guys, Well, I must admit to not being really excited by the new logo. Not to hurt people's feelings, note that it is good, but I think it could be better. None of these are really strong held but are my opinions. I was hoping for feedback

Re: Is Bugzilla Safe?

2004-11-08 Thread Christian Geisert
Clay Leeds wrote: Considering that we're going to be moving the FOP wiki[1] away from the security challenged nagoya[2], does FOP's Bugzilla[3] also need to move? Currently the only Bugzilla installation within the ASF is the one on Nagoya so there is nothing to move to. But IIRC infrastructure's

Re: XMLGraphics temp site up

2004-11-08 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Clay Leeds wrote: On Nov 8, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Thomas DeWeese wrote: As it currently is I actually prefer the 'non svg shapes' version as the used shapes are rather simplistic (it makes it looks like an 80's graphics package). I agree wholeheartedly. My intent was to get the idea of pushing the

RE: Apache XMLGraphics 'blurb' for ApacheCon 2004

2004-11-08 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Nov 8, 2004, at 5:44 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: I signed up for ApacheCon last night so I'll be there next week. Glen Wish I could be there to meet you, Glen. Same here... Vegas, right? Drag yourself away from

Re: XMLGraphics temp site up

2004-11-08 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Clay Leeds wrote: I've attached a slightly (very rough!) modified version which gives an idea of what I think may work better. Namely, the paper is curled in a different direction, so the XML on the 'back side' is horizontal, making it more readable. Although it's not 'true' (i.e., the text

Re: XMLGraphics temp site up

2004-11-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 8, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Thomas DeWeese wrote: Clay Leeds wrote: I've attached a slightly (very rough!) modified version which gives an idea of what I think may work better. Namely, the paper is curled in a different direction, so the XML on the 'back side' is horizontal, making it more

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-08 Thread Simon Pepping
Clay, On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:48:23PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of book.xml is deprecated in Forrest-0.6 in favor

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Simon Pepping wrote: Clay, On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:48:23PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of