block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for all the comments so far on my questions. I'm afraid I have to postpone some of the issues, however. Now, I've got a different problem. I run accross a bug in layout concerning block-containers with height/BPD specified (absolute-position=auto). I tried to fix it but I can't find the

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Now, I've got a different problem. I run accross a bug in layout concerning block-containers with height/BPD specified (absolute-position=auto). I tried to fix it but I can't find the passage in the spec that tells me how to deal with the space that is not

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageSequenceLayoutManager.java

2005-01-26 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Can anyone tell why there was such a layout manager reuse in the first place? I guess there was a reason. On 26.01.2005 18:51:55 jeremias wrote: jeremias2005/01/26 09:51:55 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageSequenceLayoutManager.java Log:

Re: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 26.01.2005 18:43:58 Victor Mote wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Now, I've got a different problem. I run accross a bug in layout concerning block-containers with height/BPD specified (absolute-position=auto). I tried to fix it but I can't find the passage in the spec that tells me

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Given a block-container where the BPD is specified, are its children subject to column/page breaking if the whole block-container doesn't fit into the available area in BP direction? If yes, how is the remaining space in BP direction My reading of the passage cited

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...Anyway, maybe I should ask the question in a different way: Given a block-container where the BPD is specified, are its children subject to column/page breaking if the whole block-container doesn't fit into the

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Victor Mote
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: In either case it seems to make little sense to speak of 'remaining space' as in 'the space not allocated by descendant FOs inside the b-c', unless you mean the space remaining on the _page_ after the first child viewport for the b-c is added. The sum of the

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Feifei Lu
please remove my email address in this list. Thanks. --- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: In either case it seems to make little sense to speak of 'remaining space' as in 'the space not allocated by descendant FOs inside the b-c', unless you mean the

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
try sending a message to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' -Original Message- From: Feifei Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 26 januari 2005 22:16 To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: RE: block-containers with BPD set please remove my email address in this list. Thanks.

Re: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread The Web Maestro
We can't unsubscribe you. To unsubscribe, you need to send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Maestro Clay On Jan 26, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Feifei Lu wrote: please remove my email address in this list. Thanks. --- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: In either case it seems

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageSequenceLayoutManager.java

2005-01-26 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Can anyone tell why there was such a layout manager reuse in the first place? I guess there was a reason. I Should know because I wrote the first version, but I can't remember the details. I guess it had something to do with the overhead of constructing the LM. BTW page

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 26 januari 2005 21:49 Just to be clear (not argumentative), I was saying something quite different. For the example that Andreas has given, my understanding is that there would only be one child viewport

RE: block-containers with BPD set

2005-01-26 Thread Victor Mote
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Do you feel the contents of the block-container should not be broken up at all? (Hence the analogy to a fo:external-graphic?) No, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that. I think the contents can (possibly, depending on the overflow constraints) be broken up, but that