DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33738.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Empty
table-bodies make no
sense but it makes life easier for stylesheet
writers not to have to
work around them.
I don't see the benefits. In XSLT, one does a test to
see if there is data in the source XML that would
constitute a
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have nothing more to say about this. I want to
spend my time on more
productive things now.
Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would
like the content model restored to the XSL standard
and the FONode.removeNode() method removed.
On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
snip/
For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto itself. Your veto makes
this situation a one against one. I have presented my reasons for the
change and therefore, I request feedback from the rest of the committers
on this matter even if it's just a
