Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
snip/
For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto itself. Your veto makes
this situation a one against one. I have presented my reasons for the
change and therefore, I request feedback from the rest of the committers
on this
On Feb 24, 2005, at 10:21 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have nothing more to say about this. I want to
spend my time on more
productive things now.
Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would
like the content model restored to the XSL standard
and
Jeremias,
My veto still stands, along with the seven technical
reasons given for it.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
snip/
For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto
itself. Your veto makes
this situation a one against
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:21:25PM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote:
Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would
like the content model restored to the XSL standard
and the FONode.removeNode() method removed.
I support Jeremias' change, and vote +1.
Technical reasons:
2.) You failed
Simon,
Thanks for reading and responding to my concerns. I
appreciate it. Your endorsement of this change is
sufficient for me--I am withdrawing my veto.
Regards,
Glen
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:21:25PM -0800, Glen Mazza
wrote:
Jeremias, I'm
