the containing page
whose is-last trait is set to true and that follows in the
area tree any other similarly constrained area that is attached
to an identically named fo:marker, using pre-order traversal
order.
Regards,
Tony Graham
that are unbounded in one or both
directions (i.e. where there is only ever one page) and also doesn't
describe the possible processing model of making all the pages from
the fo:flow and then going back and fixing up the static content.
Regards,
Tony Graham
are
interested in xmlroff, see the SourceForge sites.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3
be a failed internal project to create a commercial product.
No.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business
if Arved and/or Eric would consider assisting with the
project. Frankly, I would be pleased if *anybody* assisted with the
project, but Arved and Eric would be a bonus.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
Sun
.
The formatter is awaiting final approval before the code can be made public source.
An announcement will be made on xsl-list, www-xsl-fo, and XSL-FO@YahooGroups once the
code is available.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center
Sun Microsystems Ireland
Peter B. West wrote at 30 Sep 2002 13:28:18 +1000:
Tony Graham wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 27 Sep 2002 16:44:32 -0300:
...
That means -, #12235 , etc are characters, while '1' is not.
#12235; is a character reference. '#12235' is how you talk about a
character's code
Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300:
Tony Graham says that character should be a Unicode character, or Char. As
in the actual real, encoded thing.
Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding:
grepping the XSL CR test suite shows everybody, FOP included
Peter B. West wrote at 28 Sep 2002 00:39:34 +1000:
...
Tony Graham wrote:
...
Section 5.11, Property Datatypes, trumps the individual property
definitions, since Section 5.11 defines the syntax for specifying the
datatypes usable in property values. It says A single Unicode
literal, but while you
could claim that it is one character, there's no XSL conversion from a
string to a character, so fo:character character='1'/ should fail.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
by the OpenType specification [OpenType].
Maybe you also need to look at the OpenType spec.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd
of FOP 2.0?
Regards,
Tony Graham
Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3
12 matches
Mail list logo
