Re: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package
Good--thanks everyone--I'll take care of this soon. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On 20.11.2003 00:01:23 Glen Mazza wrote: > > Speaking of which, any objection if I "promote" > the > > org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level > Fonts > > package? It is currently being referenced by the > AWT, > > MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of > > them), indicating that it's probably better placed > > there. > > > > Here's my +1. > > > Jeremias Maerki > __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package
+1 On 20.11.2003 00:01:23 Glen Mazza wrote: > Speaking of which, any objection if I "promote" the > org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts > package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, > MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of > them), indicating that it's probably better placed > there. > > Here's my +1. Jeremias Maerki
Re: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package
Speaking of which, any objection if I "promote" the org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of them), indicating that it's probably better placed there. Here's my +1. +1 J.Pietschmann
RE: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package
Glen Mazza wrote: > Speaking of which, any objection if I "promote" the > org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts > package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, > MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of > them), indicating that it's probably better placed > there. > > Here's my +1. +1. I think I had done that on my local machine as part of a bunch of font changes that need to be made. I think it actually needs to be merged with another class (I forget which one), but we can work on that later. Victor Mote