Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 08.03.2005 03:18:21 Renaud Richardet wrote: snip/ On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 , Jeremias Maerki wrote: AbstractRenderer: I moved what I could reuse from PDFRenderer to AbstractRenderer: renderTextDecorations(), handleRegionTraits(), and added the needed empty methods. I think that

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-08 Thread Jeremias Maerki
By the way, Renaud, you should sign and send an ICLA (Individual Contributor license agreement) to the ASF if you haven't done so already. http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas Just so we're on the safe side. After all you're not just doing little bug fixes. Thanks! Jeremias Maerki

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-08 Thread Renaud Richardet
Thanks for integrating my patch in FOP. But how can I get an awt.Image from a FopImage? I've modified your patch to demonstrate, but it needs some additional work to handle the different color models. Probably the image package should be extended to provide the necessary

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-08 Thread Victor Mote
Renaud Richardet wrote: 1. FOray has factored the FOP font logic into a separate module, cleaned it up significantly, and made some modest improvements. A few weeks ago, I aXSL-ized it as well, which means that it is written to a (theoretically) independent interface:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-07 Thread Renaud Richardet
I worked on my patch and tried to integrate you inputs. There are still many issues, but I think the basic structure is OK. You can find a patch attached to bug 33760. Comments inline: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Victor Mote wrote: 1. FOray has factored the FOP font logic into a separate module,

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-03-01 Thread Renaud Richardet
Victor and Jeremias, thanks for your Inputs. Victor, I've checked out your aXSL. I'll study it and come back to you if I have questions. Jeremias wrote: Speaking of startVParea(), could we rename it to something more meanigfull? Proposition: TransformPosition, or something like this.

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Victor Mote
Renaud Richardet wrote (in Bugzilla): http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760 Summary: [Patch] current AWTRenderer Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev ... = Points I would like to discuss (see the corresponding FIXME in the code) = Fonts: I

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
(Comments inline) On 27.02.2005 23:51:25 bugzilla wrote: I've been working on the AWTRenderer those last days. Before I move forward, I would welcome some feedback to know if I'm heading in the right direction. I think you are. Interesting work. Keep it up! = What I did = Basically, I

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for bringing this up. I almost forgot. I'd be in favor of integrating Victor's improvements in this area. However, I'd also be inclined to gently nudge you, Victor, to bring the font stuff back to Apache into the XML Graphics Commons area once that's set up. But I wouldn't have a problem

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thanks for bringing this up. I almost forgot. I'd be in favor of integrating Victor's improvements in this area. However, I'd also be inclined to gently nudge you, Victor, to bring the font stuff back to Apache into the XML Graphics Commons area once that's set up.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I think you misunderstood. I wanted to suggest transferring (not copying/forking) these parts over to Apache with you as a committer in the Commons part. That would make it mostly your decision. I'm all against duplication of efforts. Actually, it was the motivation for this post. At Apache you'd

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] New: - [Patch] current AWTRenderer

2005-02-28 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think you misunderstood. I wanted to suggest transferring (not copying/forking) these parts over to Apache with you as a committer in the Commons part. That would make it mostly your decision. I'm all against duplication of efforts. Actually, it was the motivation