RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-30 Thread Rhett Aultman
Heh...just give me some time. We might get Java 1.1 compatibility dynamically loaded yet. ;) -Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request Victor, The IAC

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-29 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 11:40, RamanaJV wrote: Ralph, Your idea of Fixing the awt renderer is the correct one. After a deep thought, I too came to the conclusion that instead of writing a PDF renderer, if we can tune up the AWT renderer, it will be great. The main problem with AWT

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Matthew L. Avizinis wrote: It might also be helpful to recognize that as FOP becomes more popular there are distinctly _two_ groups of users emerging. The first group has been using FOP from the beginning and those are the Java developers who use FOP to create some other end product.

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Rhett Aultman
]] Sent: Fri 7/26/2002 7:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request Folks, Excuse my ignorance but is the pdf viewer everyone is talking about provided already by Adobe on a huge

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-28 Thread Victor Mote
Rhett Aultman wrote: -Start- Yes, it's called Acrobat Reader. What's being requested is something a little more tightly integrated to FOP. -End- RamanaJV wrote: -Start- Acrobat reader is a outside application. If I launch it through a swing application, it gives the

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-26 Thread Mark Malone
Folks, Excuse my ignorance but is the pdf viewer everyone is talking about provided already by Adobe on a huge number of platforms and called acrobat reader? Or is it something else that is being requested? Also, pdf file reading is built into MacOS X as is pdf generation via native print

Re: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ralph LaChance wrote: At 12:46 PM 7/25/02, you wrote: After seeing the OutOfMemoryError, the AWT renderer is causing, why don't thinking of providing a PDF viewer in the FOP itself. I think, this will be useful so much. I don't think people couldn't have ever thought about it,

RE: [PDF Viewer] Utility request

2002-07-25 Thread Rhett Aultman
I see FOP's role as being a data transformer first and foremost. We may want to consider packaging a PDF viewer with FOP, but I'd recommend against putting it *IN* FOP. -Original Message- From: RamanaJV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL