Just nitpicking, but could we call it ExampleFO2PDF-SAXParser instead of
just SAX, because the transformer solution relies on SAX, too? I don't
have a problem with long names. :-)
On 16.07.2004 21:14:18 Simon Pepping wrote:
Perhaps it is a good idea to illustrate the transformer solution in
I renamed it yesterday.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just nitpicking, but could we call it
ExampleFO2PDF-SAXParser instead of
just SAX, because the transformer solution relies
on SAX, too? I don't
have a problem with long names. :-)
On 16.07.2004 21:14:18 Simon
Great. Sorry for the noise.
On 20.07.2004 22:34:28 Glen Mazza wrote:
I renamed it yesterday.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just nitpicking, but could we call it
ExampleFO2PDF-SAXParser instead of
just SAX, because the transformer solution relies
on SAX, too? I
Good idea...this way those who prefer the
SAXParserFactory method can see how FOP would work
this way. (I tried to show both cases in one example,
but it just made a mess of things.) If you could take
care of this for us, it would be appreciated--else
I'll (probably) get to it eventually.
Glen
Glen,
I can see Jeremias' argument for a single pattern to deal with all
situations, but I am pleased to see the SAX solution illustrated by an
example in this simplest case of all.
Perhaps it is a good idea to illustrate the transformer solution in
ExampleFO2PDF, and the outlying SAX parser
Because, IMO, it allows the user to use the same pattern for virtually
everything:
1. Create a TransformerFactory
2. Create a Transformer and optionally use a stylesheet
3. Specify the Source (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
4. Specify the Result (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
5. Start the
Thanks, Simon--I didn't think of this way of solving
the problem--I just modified Jeremias' previous DOM
example. However, I placed the method below
temporarily in the example and committed it before
returning to the Transformer version. This way, we
have a working example should we ever need to
Sounds good.
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because, IMO, it allows the user to use the same
pattern for virtually
everything:
1. Create a TransformerFactory
2. Create a Transformer and optionally use a
stylesheet
3. Specify the Source (DOM, stream, file, SAX)
4. Specify
