[GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-22 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-04 Thread Chris Bowditch
Glen Mazza wrote: I'll take care of it by this weekend, if not much sooner. Thanks Glen, where would we be without you! Chris

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-03 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-03 Thread Clay Leeds
The thing that caught my eye is that it indicates xml-fop-maintenance. I thought the maintenance branch (fop-0_20_2-maintain) was frozen (I haven't noticed anyone updating the code--I doubt it, but could it be my manual update of the design/layout.html page? If so, my apologies!). At first

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Clay Leeds wrote: The thing that caught my eye is that it indicates xml-fop-maintenance. I thought the maintenance branch (fop-0_20_2-maintain) was frozen (I haven't noticed anyone updating the code--I doubt it, but could it be my manual update of the design/layout.html page? It's probably

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
J.Pietschmann wrote: I wonder why HEAD isn't affected? Darn, HEAD got it too :-/ J.Pietschmann

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: xml-fop-maintenance/xml-fop-maintenance failed

2004-08-03 Thread Glen Mazza
I'll take care of it by this weekend, if not much sooner. Glen --- J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: J.Pietschmann wrote: I wonder why HEAD isn't affected? Darn, HEAD got it too :-/ J.Pietschmann