Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Le Vendredi, 7 mars 2003, à 17:39 Europe/Zurich, Jeremias Maerki a écrit : ...My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started +0.5, the IDE thing might be useful. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, -0, I don't see a need here. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: [..] If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. +0.5 (I don't see a real need but it's a bit nicer and if it helps IDE users ..) [..] As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. -0 Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: [..] If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. +0.5 (I don't see a real need but it's a bit nicer and if it helps IDE users ..) +0, for the same reasons as Christian. [..] As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. I have struggled a little with Eclipse, eventually limiting my expectations to being able to use it as a debugger. Anything which makes setup for this and other IDEs easier is a plus. -0 on maintenance. I want very soon to tag the tree and create an alt integration branch. If this change is to go ahead, I will wait until it is in place. -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ Lord, to whom shall we go? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the maintenance branch. Result: - No CVS surgery - Ability to fully restore a state - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started If the first two of these motivations are correct, then +1. If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. Agree, -0. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. +0 J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the maintenance branch. Result: - No CVS surgery - Ability to fully restore a state - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. +1 If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the maintenance branch. Result: - No CVS surgery - Ability to fully restore a state - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
