RE: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package

2003-11-20 Thread Victor Mote
Glen Mazza wrote: Speaking of which, any objection if I promote the org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of them), indicating that it's probably better placed there. Here's

Re: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package

2003-11-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Speaking of which, any objection if I promote the org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of them), indicating that it's probably better placed there. Here's my +1. +1

Re: [VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package

2003-11-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
+1 On 20.11.2003 00:01:23 Glen Mazza wrote: Speaking of which, any objection if I promote the org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to the top-level Fonts package? It is currently being referenced by the AWT, MIF, PS, RTF, and XML renderers (basically all of them), indicating that it's probably

[VOTE] Move org.apache.fop.pdf.FontSetup to fonts package

2003-11-19 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure what you are asking for here. IIRC, layout.FontState has basically been moved to fonts.Font. What has happened (I think) is that the font variant code was added to the maintenance branch, but not to the trunk. I actually don't have much