Hello Fopsters,
I use FOP (dev 1.0) in a bit different scenario as you. My renderer works in
GEF framework. Till now, I have hacked simple change in relevant layout
managers:
BlockLayoutManager.getParentArea(Area childArea) {
...
// this creates connection between fobj and curBlockArea:
I'm quite leery of the changes he's proposing at this
time. The complexity of the system would shoot
through the roof, it's not a solid OO/logical design
(our LayoutManagers are currently responsible for the
creation of areas, as they should be), and futhermore,
I find his more modular arguments
.sourceforge.net/
- Original Message -
From: Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Connection between FObj and Area
I'm quite leery of the changes he's proposing at this
time. The complexity of the system would shoot
--- Tibor Vyletel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Glen,
I am aware of the LMs' function in the system. The
problem is that their
instantiation is hardcoded, too. At least, I don't
see any quick method how
to make a descendant of a LM and plug this new
class (with just a little
change) to
[Tibor Vyletel]
Hello Fopsters,
I use FOP (dev 1.0) in a bit different scenario as you. My renderer works in
GEF framework. Till now, I have hacked simple change in relevant layout
managers:
BlockLayoutManager.getParentArea(Area childArea) {
...
// this creates connection between fobj and
- Original Message -
From: Finn Bock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: Connection between FObj and Area
[Tibor Vyletel]
Hello Fopsters,
I use FOP (dev 1.0) in a bit different scenario as you. My renderer
works in
GEF
