Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Another detail overlooked is the column-number property, ...
Which is, for the moment quite ... unimplemented (--should've checked this
sooner :) ), so that explains why the spec isn't being followed when setting
the default value to 0.
This makes me think that much
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is:
How do I access the LM's for the subsequent rows at this point?
AFAICT, I have overlooked (at least) the following note in the spec (6.7.1
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
it would be easy to determine col number in Table.addChild. This number
could then be replaced in TableColumn.doSetup only if Column Number has
actually been specified in the FO. I'm not sure I would be keen on
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to keep everyone up to date about my excursions:
snip /
Another detail overlooked is the column-number property, ...
Which is, for the moment quite ... unimplemented (--should've checked this
sooner :) ), so
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is:
How do I access the LM's for the subsequent rows at this point?
AFAICT, I have overlooked (at least) the following note in the spec (6.7.1
Table Formatting Objects
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
The things I'm still looking for are
- the correct adjustment for the cell LM's height in case of rowspan
- the adjustment for the x-coordinate of the cells affected by a rowspan
I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is:
How
