On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:06:24AM +0100, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
To clear that up a bit further:
If you run a document structured like this, but with many more
page-sequences, through HEAD, the whole document will be divided into chunks
of about 60 pages (
-Original Message-
From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:06:24AM +0100, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
To clear that up a bit further:
If you run a document structured like this, but with many more
page-sequences,
BTW: I ran a further test on a more extended version of the document ( TOC
of 6 pages + 338 detail pages ) without the basic-links. 0.20.5 had no
problems, while HEAD threw an OOM Error (both running with a max heap of
128MB).
IMHO this would indicate that somehow the page-sequences aren't
Tried the following type of FO-document:
- one page-sequence with a sort of TOC, a fo:table with basic-links to
detail-blocks
- multiple page-sequences, one for each detail-block
In the test document, the TOC is about five pages, containing links to +/-
300 detail-blocks. The detail-blocks all
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
In 0.20.5 this works very fine... In HEAD strangely the document is layed
^
laid :-)
out such that the first TOC page ends up
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
In 0.20.5 this works very fine... In HEAD strangely the
document is layed
^
laid :-)
Ahem... Sorry 'bout that.
out such that the first TOC page ends up after the last
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't understand the problem. Could you trim it down to two
detail blocks,
and post the FO (assuming the trimmed down FO still
