RE: [VOTE] Re: LayoutStrategy

2003-07-25 Thread Victor Mote
Victor Mote wrote: Because we are such a small group, I am hoping to get unanimity on all of the points. If I have addressed your concerns with the above clarifications, please consider changing the -1 votes to a zero (or better). If anybody has serious reservations, I need to think about

RE: [VOTE] Re: LayoutStrategy

2003-07-25 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. I'm not sure how to interpret the silence. I'm going to press on with my proposals unless I get some sort of substantive reply. Victor Mote Victor, I apologize for the silence--I did read your email on Sunday and more thoroughly

RE: [VOTE] Re: LayoutStrategy

2003-07-25 Thread Victor Mote
Glen Mazza wrote: Ideally, that would be mostly it. My current design-thinking is that once flow of control leaves the apps package, it does not return until has a full document finished. I think we are on the same page here, or at least I see no conflict. I don't think of the control

RE: [VOTE] Re: LayoutStrategy

2003-07-21 Thread Victor Mote
Glen Mazza wrote: --- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. In other words, I would like to have permission to temporarily treat Driver as either a singleton or a location for static constructs, which can be used to control the interaction between the various modules, so that I