Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff:
Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation
Under what license where the original TeX files ?
2. If the former (of [1]) is true, we need a grant from the copyright
holder of the original
Folks,
See below the Latex License.
http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html
It seems to me that clause '8.B makes this license more restrictive than
the ASF license - and we thus should not allow code(fragements) which are
under this license in downloads from ASF infrastructure.
Or am
Thanks, Steven and Dirk for responding!
On 17.03.2003 14:28:44 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff:
Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation
Under what license where the original TeX files ?
There's another IMO: Clause 7 expects a restriction that the ASL can't
provide.
On 17.03.2003 14:32:16 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
See below the Latex License.
http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html
It seems to me that clause '8.B makes this license more restrictive than
the ASF
I've just received that email. The original author is willing to fax in
a grant. Question now: Where can I find the form? I've only found the
one for committers. Thanks a lot!
On 17.03.2003 15:23:55 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've received an email a few minutes ago from a FOP contributor telling
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
And then there's the files from the original TeX distribution by Donald
Knuth which are assumed to be in the public domain but with certain
restrictions (modified file shall not contain the same filename as the
original). Problem there is that there is not really
Thanks, Greg and Nicola, for your answers. I've already sent the form to
the person I mentioned. Now that most of my questions have been resolved
I'm off to distribute quite a bunch of these forms to all the various
copyright holders.
After it has been suggested that every single file submitted
I haven't received any reactions to my post. We still have our pending
release on hold until the issues are resolved. I wonder if I have taken
the wrong approach. Can anybody advise? Thanks!
On 06.03.2003 11:10:28 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hello all (licensing specialists, XML PMC people, fop-devs)
Hello all (licensing specialists, XML PMC people, fop-devs)
(I don't know where might be the best place to discuss this. fop-dev is
currently very low-traffic.)
The FOP team needs help. In February we realized that we had problematic
hyphenation pattern files in our codebase. For example, some
