This is (again) more of a clarifying question as I am looking in that area
of the code and I think its incorrect:
Am I correct in saying: The position of the before/after/start/end regions
on the output media is relative to the writing-mode and reference
orientation on the simple-page-master they
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Victor,
What I liked with the Avalon Logger is the one-to-one correspondance between it
and Commons' Log; commons just has one more level which is trace. So writing a
Logger adapter that delegates logs to a Log instance is trivial.
Now it's different because PseudoLogger has 7 log levels
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
What I liked with the Avalon Logger is the one-to-one
correspondance between it and Commons' Log; commons just has
one more level which is trace. So writing a Logger adapter
that delegates logs to a Log instance is trivial.
Now it's different because
FWIW, I completed today the extraction of a set of interfaces for aXSL to
generically describe an FO Tree. The FOray FOTree implements these
interfaces, and the other FOray modules have been changed to use the aXSL
interfaces instead of the FOray FOTree implementation. The only dependency
within
