On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:56, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 08:02, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 05:47, Manuel Mall wrote:
snip/
As to how the TextLM should then further handle it, I hadn't really
looked deeper into so far, but it seems like you have... 8-)
Andreas,
On Jul 20, 2007, at 14:08, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
Hi
Thought I'd chime in on this one as well...
First off: I agree with the general sentiment that this is a very
interesting initiative!
That said, as a note of caution, I do wonder whether the motivation
(with or without the bounty)
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 14:08, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
Hi
Hi
Thought I'd chime in on this one as well...
First off: I agree with the general sentiment that this is a very
interesting initiative!
That said, as a note of caution, I do wonder whether the motivation
Hi all,
Author: vhennebert
Date: Sat Jul 21 02:50:32 2007
New Revision: 558281
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=558281
Log:
Initialize merge tracking via svnmerge from the Trunk
(for applying to the 0.94 branch the applicable changes in the Trunk)
Modified:
Hi Manuel,
Author: manuel
Date: Wed Jul 18 03:40:12 2007
New Revision: 557219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=557219
Log:
Fixed incomplete support for Unicode word joiners
Can you please have a look at the attached FO file and the resulting PDF
I get? There's a word joiner
Hi Andreas,
My 2 cents on this, as I have a rather limited understanding of this area.
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
snip/
org.apache.fop.fonts.Font contains a fontSize member. I would like to
see this separated from the Font instance somehow. Instead of fetching a
Font corresponding to given
On Jul 21, 2007, at 19:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
snip/
org.apache.fop.fonts.Font contains a fontSize member. I would like to
see this separated from the Font instance somehow. Instead of
fetching a
Font corresponding to given triplet and font-size, we would
On Jul 20, 2007, at 10:52, Luca Furini wrote:
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
That's one detail I was still unsure about. Only if the other
factors remain identical, the algorithm would prefer a break at
penalty 50 over one at penalty 100... but if the value of the
penalty is only of marginal
On Sunday 22 July 2007 00:45, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Manuel,
Author: manuel
Date: Wed Jul 18 03:40:12 2007
New Revision: 557219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=557219
Log:
Fixed incomplete support for Unicode word joiners
Can you please have a look at the
