Bug report for Fop [2009/09/20]

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

PDFFontDescriptor Ascent Descent and FontBBox

2009-09-21 Thread Alexander Kiel
Hi, as I'm currently on the way to redesign the TrueType/OpenType file reading, from time to time I stumble over some odd things. But instead of blindly refactoring, I think its better to ask you before. Fonts have among other things the properties ascent, descent and fontBBox which are defined

Re: Volunteering to work on FOP development

2009-09-21 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, It may also be interesting to have a look at ICU4J [1]. I think this dependency will be necessary anyway if we are serious about implementing complex scripts. There may be stuff there that would avoid us re-inventing the wheel. [1] http://site.icu-project.org/ Vincent spepping leverkruid

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47859] added regression to font-shorthand-test.fo that shows bug

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859 Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47709] Issue with parsing the 'font' shorthand

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709 Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47709] Issue with parsing the 'font' shorthand

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709 --- Comment #3 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-09-21 04:15:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) *** Bug 47859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** See augmented patch to font-shorthand-test in bug report above.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47709] Issue with parsing the 'font' shorthand

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2009-09-21 04:38:54 PDT --- Hi Jonathan, Thank you for your contribution to fixing this issue. I think the whole parsing of this property needs to be refactored, because it's

RE: Support for Arabic in FOP

2009-09-21 Thread spepping
Licensing is not that easy. The ASF requires that the code be submitted under a Contributor License Agreement, see http://www.apache.org/licenses/. Even under more liberal regimes, having no license would not work, because there is nothing that states that it is open source. Simon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47709] Issue with parsing the 'font' shorthand

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Levinson levin...@intersystems.com 2009-09-21 10:19:15 PDT --- Hi Vincent, It was my pleasure to help out. Thank you for your review of the problems you think still remain in the font shorthand code. When

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47709] Issue with parsing the 'font' shorthand

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Levinson levin...@intersystems.com 2009-09-21 13:29:20 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=24298) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24298) Get font short hand completely working I tested

ambiguity of grammar for font shorthand?

2009-09-21 Thread Jonathan Levinson
Hi Vincent, As I read the grammar for the font shorthand it is ambiguous, though not fatally so as long as one excludes the value of inherit from individual properties in the font short hand. For instance the first optional argument is font-style, font-weight, and font-variant, each of