+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I had a look at SeekableStream and I can imagine how the needs resulted
in the ImageInputStream interface. I haven't decided yet if I should use
ImageInputStream directly. Maybe someone else can throw it's two cents
in here.
Here are my two
Hi,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 27.09.2009 13:27:35 Alexander Kiel wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
Makes sense. I stumbled over that myself from time to time but it didn't
really bother me so much to take action.
Okay. Can you please modify the checkstyle XML files to reflect that?
Sure, but only
Alex,
The checkstyle checks are historically grown, and are therefore
incomplete. I personally would turn on much more checks for certain
style issues I like. IMO every option set helps deciding a certain
factor. So more the more checks the better :)
(in short: +1 to your changes).
Right now we
Hi Guys,
Maybe a bit late, but you may find the following page interesting:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FOPIntelliJSetup
Feel free to make any additions or corrections to this document.
As to the use of checkstyle: I think the rules were set up long after
the project was created. So
Hi Carlos,
Carlos Villegas wrote:
Hi,
I searched the mailing lists and it seems that although some people had
worked at several times at trying to implement retrieve-table-marker,
it's not yet done. Is somebody working on this? What's the status?
It’s not being worked on at the moment.
Hi Jonathan,
Interesting stuff!
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
Hi Vincent,
snip/
Because font-variant font-style and font-weight can occur in any order,
I could not (currently) come up with a grammar in which the directing
sets were disjoint for each non-terminal. So I was unable to come up
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Jeremias Maerki jerem...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Thanks for the pointers. I agree that implementing retrieve-table-marker
is not only a more generic solution but also what the spec requires.
However, I'm short on time and this seems easier so I'll give it a try
first.
Regards,
Carlos
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Carlos Villegas
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
IFParser is also still missing the parse code for the structure tree. I
guess I would defer the call to startPageSequence in the IFParser, then
parse the reduced FO tree using a ContentHandler delegate, set that on
the user agent and then call
Hi Vincent,
However, new committed code is not supposed to break any rule, neither
warnings nor errors.
Really? That means commenting every public method even simple Getters
and Setters? Commenting equals(), hashCode() and toString()? I think,
this would be only clutter.
Best Regards
Alex
Hi Jonathan,
However, I notice there are still warnings.
BlockStackingLayoutManager.java: 16 items
Missing a Javadoc comment. (58:5)
'parentArea' hides a field. (115:47)
'parentArea' hides a field. (145:50)
Method length is 185 lines (max allowed is 150) (372:5)
Etc.,
At
Hi Vincent,
Here are my two cents: if you make use of classes in javax.imagio at
only one place in your font library, then there’s no need to worry about
creating a more neutral layer. If OTOH you need to use those classes
everywhere, then it makes sense to use a simplified abstraction
Alex,
2009/9/28 Alexander Kiel alexanderk...@gmx.net:
Hi Vincent,
However, new committed code is not supposed to break any rule, neither
warnings nor errors.
Really? That means commenting every public method even simple Getters
and Setters?
Yes. Simple Getter and Setters are the only
14 matches
Mail list logo
