https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
--- Comment #3 from Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org 2010-12-09 07:01:32 EST
---
(In reply to comment #0)
Apparently the KnuthElement's position is null (oldElement.getPosition()). I
attached a patch which adds an additional check in
Is there a way to simplify FOP? I have the 1.0 source. I can run the
ant build and it creates a new jar. Now I tried excluding a font class
I don't need, and it failed the build on a junit test. I tried
commenting that test out and it failed a different test. I excluded a
few tests and it
Hi,
Junit tests are for pre-commit purpose.
You can easily avoid them by running the right ant option:
ant package.
see [1] for further info on running ant with fop.
[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.0/compiling.html#env-ant
Le 09/12/2010 14:08, Eric Douglas a écrit :
Is there a way to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35500
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Gilmut andreasgil...@gmx.de 2010-12-09 11:23:19
EST ---
The affected class is org.apache.fop.image.JpegImage. It is part of fop itself
in version 0.20.5.
In the method loadImage() the close call of inStream is
I tried commenting out the base 14 collection statement here and it created
fop.jar but I've set it up differently than on my hone PC.
Here my ant build starts out telling me this.
[echo] --- Apache FOP 1.0 [1999-2010]
[echo] See build.properties and
