https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #17 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com 2012-03-09 09:12:12
UTC ---
snip/
- I don't think we get added value by testing the hashCode() equals()
implementations. The tests don't protect from future changes in the tested
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #18 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com 2012-03-09 09:15:10
UTC ---
snip
Why not just put that in a unit test?? None of this code is tested and a
little
mistake could have far-reaching ramifications.
By that I obviously
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Bug #: 52873
Summary: Assertion failure in
o.a.f.complexscripts.fonts.GlyphCoverageTable with
fonts having out of order or duplicate glyph indexes
Product: Fop
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28412|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52873
Alex Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project xml-fop-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
