Hi, Thomas Dörr <thomas.doerr <at> haufe-lexware.net> writes: > But I'd prefer continuing to > use FOP.
Same here, FOP served us very well in the past and there is no reason to switch… > We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of > course we'd pay for that implementation. Let me second that, if someone steps up to implement that I am sure we can throw money into the bowl too. Regards, Florian
