https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Bug 51150 depends on bug 43940, which changed state.
Bug 43940 Summary: [PATCH] Faster method for double formatting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Bug 51150 depends on bug 43940, which changed state.
Bug 43940 Summary: [PATCH] Faster method for double formatting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Bug 51150 depends on bug 43940, which changed state.
Bug 43940 Summary: [PATCH] Faster method for double formatting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #18 from Unlogic unlo...@unlogic.se 2012-04-27 08:44:05 UTC ---
Great, will there be a FOP 1.0.1 release containing this fix or do we have to
wait until FOP 1.1 is released?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #19 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Patches for bug 43490 seems to be incomplete. I will try to add what is
missing, and then test if memory leak is gone.
Patch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #20 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Great, will there be a FOP 1.0.1 release containing this fix or do we have
to wait until FOP 1.1 is released?
no on a FOP 1.0.1; an FOP 1.1 is being
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #15 from Unlogic unlo...@unlogic.se 2012-04-25 07:50:54 UTC ---
I took a quick look at the patch in bug 43940 and from what I can see it
replaces DecimalFormatCache with a new implementation that doesn't use
ThreadLocal at all
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #16 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-25 16:31:48 UTC ---
Patches for bug 43490 seems to be incomplete. I will try to add what is
missing, and then test if memory leak is gone.
-Ognjen
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #14 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-24 05:41:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #6)
Ok, I will take a look if proposed pathces by Andreas and Julien for bug
#43940
still work, and do
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #9 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-09 10:55:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28561
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28561
Example demonstrating the problem
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #11 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-09 11:10:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 28562
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28562
Same example with simplified FO file.
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #12 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-09 15:23:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Ok, I will take a look if proposed pathces by Andreas and Julien for bug
#43940
still work, and do they solve problems with Tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org 2012-04-09 17:39:43
UTC ---
The content of attachment 28561 has been deleted by
Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org
who provided the following reason:
Message-ID:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #7 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-07 01:42:28 UTC ---
resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #4 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2011-07-26 16:34:24 UTC ---
I just changed bug name to more proper one.
The source of the problem is this:
1. DecimalFormat is not thread safe
2. FOP uses DecimalFormat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #5 from Jeremias Maerki jerem...@apache.org 2011-07-26 16:58:06
UTC ---
I wonder if this bug is not a duplicate of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
I'd rather not use a cache and possibly add another
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #6 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2011-07-26 17:16:34 UTC ---
Ok, I will take a look if proposed pathces by Andreas and Julien for bug #43940
still work, and do they solve problems with Tomcat memory leak.
25 matches
Mail list logo
