https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Luca,
great summary and I appreciate you taking a serious look into this
problem. Some comments below.
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:48 pm, Luca Furini wrote:
Manuel Mall wrote:
After that we really need to redesign the line breaking stuff. Not
the Knuth approach (and the implemented algorithms
First of all, thanks for your comments: I really tend to forget in a short
time all the details concerning white space!
Manuel Mall wrote:
Glyphs are only allowed to be merged if they carry the same / matching
set of property values. Personally I would not be concerned if we
therefore limit
AFAIK, there's no such flag in XSL-FO. In 0.20.5 this was simply
controlled per font over its configuration. We'd have to create an
extension property to locally switch off kerning once it's available.
On 05.12.2005 16:18:25 Manuel Mall wrote:
snip/
Side note: Does XSL-FO provide any user
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
