Both proposed changes are now implemented. I'm not sure if I got
everything right WRT the indent behaviour. I guess I'll have to wait for
feedback from those people who wanted that feature in the first place.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=354763view=rev
On Dec 1, 2005, at 12:53, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi,
There are two issues I'd like to discuss. They come from feedback from
customers:
The first concerns indent inheritance which I documented in [1].
snip /
+1 for making this configurable.
[1]
Hey gang,
There are two issues I'd like to discuss. They come from feedback from
customers:
The first concerns indent inheritance which I documented in [1]. It
turns out that most commercial implementations decided to deliberately
break indent inheritance to work around the expectations of
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The first concerns indent inheritance [...]
So what I'd like to do is implement the alternative behaviour as a
configurable option in the FO tree. The default would still be what the
specification describes (see [1]), but users would be able to set a
switch that would
On 01.12.2005 13:30:05 Luca Furini wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The first concerns indent inheritance [...]
So what I'd like to do is implement the alternative behaviour as a
configurable option in the FO tree. The default would still be what the
specification describes (see
