Re: Inquiry: conditional inclusion of dev-related debugging?

2005-11-09 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 9, 2005, at 09:31, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Jeremias / Finn, I agree that we should keep an eye on logging. What you propose is certainly an option. Some random thoughts: - I wonder how it would affect the source code (readbility). You'd have to write a debug() method in each class that

Re: Inquiry: conditional inclusion of dev-related debugging?

2005-11-09 Thread Finn Bock
[Andreas] Hi all, For starters: it's not really a pressing matter ATM, but it may become of relevance if we want to strive for a production-release. The matter is somewhat related to the distinction between developer- and user-directed logging. It concerns the numerous log.debug() and l

Re: Inquiry: conditional inclusion of dev-related debugging?

2005-11-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I agree that we should keep an eye on logging. What you propose is certainly an option. Some random thoughts: - I wonder how it would affect the source code (readbility). You'd have to write a debug() method in each class that logs to a separate logger. - Right now I don't know of any bigger compon

Inquiry: conditional inclusion of dev-related debugging?

2005-11-08 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
Hi all, For starters: it's not really a pressing matter ATM, but it may become of relevance if we want to strive for a production-release. The matter is somewhat related to the distinction between developer- and user-directed logging. It concerns the numerous log.debug() and log.trace() m