On 13.01.2007 06:32:15 Manuel Mall wrote:
> While looking into the support for the Soft Hyphen the area of
> hyphenation combined with kerning is causing me trouble.
>
> Aside 1: our fonts page claims we don't support kerning but I believe we
> do.
Yes, we do.
> Aside 2: Our tests are based o
Right, it isn't hard. Almost works after a train ride to Zurich and back.
:-)
On 13.10.2006 11:33:09 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...Maybe I'll try to figure
> > out if it's a small change to bypass the metrics file entirely. :-)
>
>
On 10/13/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Maybe I'll try to figure
out if it's a small change to bypass the metrics file entirely. :-)
Shouldn't be hard at all, but right now I have to create a test
document to demonstrate the "new" font features for my own project, so
I won't
Thanks for the changes. I understand the necessity now. I've done some
tests and after your latest fix, everything seems to be working fine.
Let's hope our users won't be too mad at us for changing the format. I
have some time in trains this and next week. Maybe I'll try to figure
out if it's a sma
On 10/11/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I wonder how much should
be invested in versioning of those files
Ok, so I have added a simplistic versioning system for these metrics
XML files, an exception is thrown when attempting to read incompatible
metrics files (http://iss
On 10/11/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...the goal should be that we
don't rely on those XML files much longer, so I wonder how much should
be invested in versioning of those files...
Agreed - versioning is easy though, if I need to make the suggested
changes I'll probably impl
Sure. However, as we discussed in Amsterdam, the goal should be that we
don't rely on those XML files much longer, so I wonder how much should
be invested in versioning of those files. But if you don't see a way
around it... I still don't understand why exactly this change is
necessary.
On 11.10.2
On 10/11/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...If this change has an effect on the XML files generated, then we should
be careful because people might not recreate their metric files and
subsequently run into problems...
How about adding a version number to the XML metrics files?
I wonder where this got broken. I believe this used to work.
If this change has an effect on the XML files generated, then we should
be careful because people might not recreate their metric files and
subsequently run into problems.
On 11.10.2006 13:15:54 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi FOPpers,
[Luca]
...
A little doubt concerning letter spaces: at the moment, a letter space
is "assigned" to the preceding character. Is this correct? I don't
remember any section in the specs stating about the "ownership" of
letter spaces ... I think that everything is simpler, from the point of
view
: Friday, December 09, 2005 8:42 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Kerning
Starting from your final summary:
Manuel Mall wrote:
IMO FOP should limit itself to:
a) Use kerning only for consecutive characters within the same fo
Ok, but more on this later in this message ..
AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Kerning
Starting from your final summary:
Manuel Mall wrote:
> IMO FOP should limit itself to:
> a) Use kerning only for consecutive characters within the same fo
Ok, but more on this later in this message ...
> b) Limit itself to th
Starting from your final summary:
Manuel Mall wrote:
IMO FOP should limit itself to:
a) Use kerning only for consecutive characters within the same fo
Ok, but more on this later in this message ...
b) Limit itself to the kerning information in the font
Ok
c) Only apply kerning if the let
13 matches
Mail list logo
