The intermediate format and the plan towards FOP 1.0

2007-11-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Dear Foppies, it has come to my attention that not everyone seems to be happy that some of us are looking into a new design for the intermediate format which on first glance only helps those who are doing mass document production. OTOH, these considerations help in a long-term improvement of our

Re: The intermediate format and the plan towards FOP 1.0

2007-11-27 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 19:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Dear Foppies, deleted most of the post - read the original / If I would be the responsible project manager who is tasked with getting a FOP 1.0 release out with the feature set as described on the wiki I would certainly strongly resist

Re: The intermediate format and the plan towards FOP 1.0

2007-11-27 Thread Max Berger
Jeremias, Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 11:10 +0100 schrieb Jeremias Maerki: it has come to my attention that not everyone seems to be happy that some of us are looking into a new design for the intermediate format exploring a new design is never a bad idea. Indeed, one of the things I dislike

Re: The intermediate format and the plan towards FOP 1.0

2007-11-27 Thread Simon Pepping
Hi, A long-term improvement of the rendering infrastructure certainly appeals to me. If the effort to obtain better performance in mass document production does not degrade the performance in other use cases, there is no problem to try and implement it in the code. If the effort may destabilize